On 01/02/2014 01:08 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote: >> > +config HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP >> > + bool >> > + >> > +config SECCOMP >> > + bool > > I haven't looked at the other 'CONFIG_HAVE' options, but shouldn't > 'HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP' be dependent on 'SECCOMP'? Ahh, you're backwards, but right. :) I forgot to make sure that SECCOMP depends on the architecture option being set. Fixed patch is attached.