mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] qrwlock: Use smp_store_release() in write_unlock()
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:41:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D4172E.6030706@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52D353C8.4000000@numascale.com>

On 01/12/2014 09:47 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 January 2014 01:10:03 UTC+8, Waiman Long  wrote:
> > This patch modifies the queue_write_unlock() function to use the
> > new smp_store_release() function in another pending patch. It also
> > removes the temporary implementation of smp_load_acquire() and
> > smp_store_release() function in qrwlock.c.
> >
> > This patch should only be merged if PeterZ's linux-arch patch patch
> > was merged.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h |    4 +---
> >  kernel/locking/qrwlock.c      |   34 
> ----------------------------------
> >  2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h 
> b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> > index 2b9a7b4..4d4bd04 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> > @@ -179,9 +179,7 @@ static inline void queue_write_unlock(struct 
> qrwlock *lock)
> >      /*
> >       * Make sure that none of the critical section will be leaked out.
> >       */
> > -    smp_mb__before_clear_bit();
> > -    ACCESS_ONCE(lock->cnts.writer) = 0;
> > -    smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
> > +    smp_store_release(&lock->cnts.writer, 0)
>
> This will fail compilation, so probably needs further testing with 
> Peter's load_acquire/store_release barrier patches.
>

Peter,

I found out that the build failure was caused by the fact that the 
__native_word() macro (used internally by compiletime_assert_atomic()) 
allows only a size of 4 or 8 for x86-64. The data type that I used is a 
byte. Is there a reason why byte and short are not considered native?

-Longman

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-13 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-13  2:47 Daniel J Blueman
2014-01-13  3:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-13 16:41 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2014-01-14  2:28   ` Daniel J Blueman
2014-01-14 11:03     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-14 15:25       ` Waiman Long
2014-01-14 17:08       ` Matt Turner
2014-01-14 18:01         ` Richard Henderson
2014-01-14 19:09           ` Waiman Long
2014-01-14 20:20             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-14 23:44           ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15  0:25             ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-15  2:39               ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15  8:07                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-15 20:53                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 23:21                     ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]                       ` <CA+55aFydYLQeBq=4AQQp_4dAnq09ocLmde1LFaXiNAJ=wJzfFA@mail.gmail.com>
2014-01-16 10:36                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-18 10:01                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-18 11:34                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-18 12:25                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-18 12:41                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-18 21:22                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-19  0:57                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-19  8:04                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-19 19:56                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-20  0:52                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-21 15:02                                         ` Waiman Long
2014-01-21 15:41                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 16:16                                             ` Waiman Long
2014-01-15  3:08             ` Daniel J Blueman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-08 16:59 [PATCH v8 0/4] qrwlock: Introducing a queue read/write lock implementation Waiman Long
2014-01-08 16:59 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] qrwlock: Use smp_store_release() in write_unlock() Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52D4172E.6030706@hp.com \
    --to=waiman.long@hp.com \
    --cc=daniel@numascale.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome