From: Guenter Roeck <groeck7@gmail.com>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Using an optional regulator in a driver running on a PC
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 02:53:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E4E913.6030300@roeck-us.net> (raw)
Hi all,
I am currently writing a driver which uses an optional regulator
to determine a reference voltage. The regulator is truly optional;
if it is not there, the chip uses an internal reference voltage.
I am testing the driver on a PC which does not really have any
regulators installed or enabled. Kernel version is 3.13.
I noticed that the call to regulator_get() returns -EPROBE_DEFER.
Looking into the regulator core, this appears intentional; there is
obviously no devicetree entry, and there is no regulator device.
The regulator code always returns -EPROBE_DEFER in this case.
I also tried regulator_get_optional(), with the same results.
This leads to an interesting question: How are drivers which require
regulators (optional or not) supposed to run on a system
which does not support devicetree, and does not have any
regulators installed (such as a PC) ? REGULATOR_DUMMY
isn't there anymore, and the dummy code it replaces only
executes on devicetree based systems.
Also, how are non-dt systems supposed to determine if an optional
regulator exists or not ? AFAICS the regulator code always returns
-EPROBE_DEFER, which isn't very helpful. If I just assume that
-EPROBE_DEFER means that the regulator is not there, I end up with
a conflict with a system which _does_ support devicetree, where
-EPROBE_DEFER really means that the probe needs to be deferred.
Thanks,
Guenter
next reply other threads:[~2014-01-26 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-26 10:53 Guenter Roeck [this message]
2014-01-26 12:39 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52E4E913.6030300@roeck-us.net \
--to=groeck7@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®