From: Karim Yaghmour <karim.yaghmour@opersys.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com,
"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
Subject: Logging/buffering mechanism comparison? (ring buffer, relay, etc.)
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 22:38:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F303BD.3040704@opersys.com> (raw)
Just wondering if anyone had some pointers on a comparison between the
various logging/buffering mechanisms out there (ring buffer, relay,
lttng buffering, etc.)? Googling was inconclusive.
Anything that has benchmarks/pros/cons would be great.
Thanks,
--
Karim Yaghmour
CEO - Opersys inc. / www.opersys.com
http://twitter.com/karimyaghmour
reply other threads:[~2014-02-06 3:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F303BD.3040704@opersys.com \
--to=karim.yaghmour@opersys.com \
--cc=jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome