mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: vmx/pmu: Fix dummy check if lbr_desc->event is created
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 18:19:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52a30738-08b5-740c-7c6e-b7a6edcbe552@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YDU4II6Jt+E5nFmG@google.com>

On 23/02/21 18:15, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> If event
> creation fails in that flow, I would think KVM would do its best to create an
> event in future runs without waiting for additional actions from the guest.
> 
> Also, this bug suggests there's a big gaping hole in the test coverage.  AFAICT,
> event contention would lead to a #GP crash in the host due to lbr_desc->event
> being dereferenced, no?

Yes, testing contention would use the tools/testing/selftests/kvm 
framework rather than just kvm-unit-tests.

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-23 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-23  1:39 Like Xu
2021-02-23  1:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: vmx/pmu: Clear DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR bit on the debug breakpoint event Like Xu
2021-02-23 16:38   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-02-23 17:06     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-23 17:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: vmx/pmu: Fix dummy check if lbr_desc->event is created Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-23 17:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-02-23 17:19   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-02-24  2:29   ` Xu, Like
2021-02-26 22:46     ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52a30738-08b5-740c-7c6e-b7a6edcbe552@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®