From: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sx150x: support setting multiple pins at once
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:17:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52e8bbf7-f324-dd59-be4e-8a192f7a33c5@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479830762-1839-3-git-send-email-peda@axentia.se>
On 11/22/2016 05:06 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> The mask of a possible oscio pin is cached, making it easier to test
> for the exception.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sx150x.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sx150x.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sx150x.c
> index ef4ef88e0ee9..5bcede2b2cd8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sx150x.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sx150x.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ struct sx150x_pinctrl {
> } irq;
> struct mutex lock;
> const struct sx150x_device_data *data;
> + unsigned long oscio_mask;
> };
>
> static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc sx150x_8_pins[] = {
> @@ -290,14 +291,7 @@ static const struct pinctrl_ops sx150x_pinctrl_ops = {
>
> static bool sx150x_pin_is_oscio(struct sx150x_pinctrl *pctl, unsigned int pin)
> {
> - if (pin >= pctl->data->npins)
> - return false;
> -
> - /* OSCIO pin is only present in 789 devices */
> - if (pctl->data->model != SX150X_789)
> - return false;
> -
> - return !strcmp(pctl->data->pins[pin].name, "oscio");
> + return !!(BIT(pin) & pctl->oscio_mask);
> }
>
> static int sx150x_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> @@ -395,6 +389,15 @@ static void sx150x_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
>
> }
>
> +static void sx150x_gpio_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> + unsigned long *mask,
> + unsigned long *bits)
> +{
> + struct sx150x_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +
> + regmap_write_bits(pctl->regmap, pctl->data->reg_data, *mask, *bits);
> +}
> +
> static int sx150x_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> unsigned int offset)
> {
> @@ -996,6 +999,20 @@ static int sx150x_regmap_reg_write(void *context, unsigned int reg,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void sx150x_oscio_mask_init(struct sx150x_pinctrl *pctl)
> +{
> + int pin;
> +
> + /* OSCIO pin is only present in 789 devices */
> + if (pctl->data->model != SX150X_789)
> + return;
> +
> + for (pin = 0; pin < pctl->data->npins; ++pin) {
> + if (!strcmp(pctl->data->pins[pin].name, "oscio"))
> + pctl->oscio_mask |= BIT(pin);
> + }
> +}
> +
This is quite over-engineered since we have one a maximum of a single oscio line, we could only store the pin number or -1...
> static bool sx150x_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> {
> struct sx150x_pinctrl *pctl = i2c_get_clientdata(to_i2c_client(dev));
> @@ -1045,6 +1062,8 @@ static int sx150x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> if (!pctl->data)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + sx150x_oscio_mask_init(pctl);
> +
> pctl->regmap = devm_regmap_init(dev, NULL, pctl,
> &sx150x_regmap_config);
> if (IS_ERR(pctl->regmap)) {
> @@ -1069,6 +1088,8 @@ static int sx150x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> pctl->gpio.direction_output = sx150x_gpio_direction_output;
> pctl->gpio.get = sx150x_gpio_get;
> pctl->gpio.set = sx150x_gpio_set;
> + if (!pctl->oscio_mask)
> + pctl->gpio.set_multiple = sx150x_gpio_set_multiple;
> pctl->gpio.set_single_ended = sx150x_gpio_set_single_ended;
> pctl->gpio.parent = dev;
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
>
Here, a simple if (pctl->data->model != SX150X_789) would be enough, and please a comment to say why set_multiple is not acceptable for oscio.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-23 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-22 16:06 [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: sx150x: set " Peter Rosin
2016-11-22 16:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sx150x: various spelling fixes and some white-space cleanup Peter Rosin
2016-11-23 9:13 ` Neil Armstrong
2016-11-22 16:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sx150x: support setting multiple pins at once Peter Rosin
2016-11-23 9:17 ` Neil Armstrong [this message]
2016-11-23 9:20 ` [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: sx150x: set " Neil Armstrong
2016-11-23 9:39 ` Peter Rosin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52e8bbf7-f324-dd59-be4e-8a192f7a33c5@baylibre.com \
--to=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
--cc=andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peda@axentia.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®