From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a4-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a4-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1E851D5CC5; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 14:02:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.147 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730124134; cv=none; b=Wf36Rv9u8E39VnvWEYJ7N/0222J2KuxgNVQMnBQqOMelif1cnXbKOExKcs9C3ZvQYsFUk3JY/foEgm0Y9V+wrlRmG55dGrWlM+6LN8+bHPBdJU57E2Fkmc3NmvFDVEerwrS1eiyd8NPBCe8x7BrYBlYj9Uat0MmYbzRZYjI2WT4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730124134; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pRzYsZTf/6WaLODzzERgIiPto/LwdVPBcgk0H488f7o=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:Content-Type; b=U9NHLwzWWYkfhCPodt7HE1HJ+fREzimqkQDPyyP4MAMrH5EDNiEUBuYwBl8rDpkPcOXdhH+1Yb6g0oxAzPByli5JMRutybXB1uEWPpAPQVC0DvVM96Zae0fKYrA+y6lKkmkK827P4QQtmIY4AvEJy86uzmWsc0Dt7DMps1yNAPw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b=ea1ZHKin; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=hO0xGr3d; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.147 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b="ea1ZHKin"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="hO0xGr3d" Received: from phl-compute-10.internal (phl-compute-10.phl.internal [10.202.2.50]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005041380145; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 10:02:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-imap-11 ([10.202.2.101]) by phl-compute-10.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 28 Oct 2024 10:02:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1730124129; x=1730210529; bh=r+OiIDFujfOkX27UX0KnwST8oK9dQeo/ifyz/Fg5BH4=; b= ea1ZHKinNqus8IGzLA0oTFE4P8eRvXz95Gu5TPOZKkfCwqi3o86yRLUeKd+xjsV/ VAdxqjBHMU4mbZ1NNQIL+AkizkZFo7uPqB4Dhy0dzlTs7C2kOqkJDkkVqKYiTqRQ 2sHm3uJd/fNIYWIKiHQpAxXr78IkZuLZf/teNibdYoCgWD/y2xBMWRwAWo7+2kXB mOz2QneV3wkZ9SVACHGRZaSpIuMORxksHPJQTpqREkvsZvMnLqmnqydFlnIE11Ar 1zWCeU0jIcyS7FHjICFf9GIVaCcC7WOYoezrJ4p0Pv+VXd/jFCozyvCh+W95kFn5 2OjJd4ndjB03ePJdylFrGg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1730124129; x= 1730210529; bh=r+OiIDFujfOkX27UX0KnwST8oK9dQeo/ifyz/Fg5BH4=; b=h O0xGr3doGLlUkgjlmoh7OqE6Go73AJPRNJ2+M0xnafE48wa5BDYmecI4VeFFd8wy 1mR2cyj3hCZ7Vs7addrbq1jmRaWoyV6MWOcq/h/G//pspPLPYi6dbnPKR+GO8lZO exwodB+SzfiurYhUkZ1oEr3hG5WjoMRqCo1locWNOEbi2ww4RTzCyKOP6XJyjhqb UAbp68IQ028mACjJez/rn3Fx9hvzf5AU6cvXtsujM0b+JsjAmfqXkbn/swagzZWM jr8qhlNh5hpPqiNHDl3YQs3hBUBNB5Wdzu5viL726P4ZAdgQac9kcjF+KRExX+48 uEbtRzMFWC1CCrC6GXZ2Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrvdejledgfedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnh htshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepofggfffhvfevkfgjfhfutgfgsehtjeertdertddt necuhfhrohhmpedftehrnhguuceuvghrghhmrghnnhdfuceorghrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrd guvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfdthfdvtdefhedukeetgefggffhjeeggeetfefg gfevudegudevledvkefhvdeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpe hmrghilhhfrhhomheprghrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrdguvgdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepvddu pdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegurghvihgurdhlrghighhhthesrg gtuhhlrggsrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoheptggrthgrlhhinhdrmhgrrhhinhgrshesrghr mhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehmihhquhgvlhdrrhgrhihnrghlsegsohhothhlihhnrd gtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohephhgthhesihhnfhhrrgguvggrugdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthho pehjvhgvthhtvghrsehkrghlrhgrhihinhgtrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohephihsihhonh hnvggruheskhgrlhhrrgihihhntgdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegthhgvnhhhuhgrtggr iheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepghhuohhrvghnsehkvghrnhgvlhdroh hrghdprhgtphhtthhopeifihhllheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.phl.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id C7E272220071; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 10:02:07 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 14:01:42 +0000 From: "Arnd Bergmann" To: "Julian Vetter" , "Catalin Marinas" , "Will Deacon" , guoren , "Huacai Chen" , "WANG Xuerui" , "Andrew Morton" , "Geert Uytterhoeven" , "Richard Henderson" , "Niklas Schnelle" , "Takashi Iwai" , "Miquel Raynal" , "David Laight" , "Johannes Berg" , "Christoph Hellwig" Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "linux-csky@vger.kernel.org" , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, Linux-Arch , "Yann Sionneau" Message-Id: <52edd934-a1ca-427f-81f8-7d7dff2d626f@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20241028134227.4020894-1-jvetter@kalrayinc.com> References: <20241028134227.4020894-1-jvetter@kalrayinc.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/4] Replace fallback for IO memcpy and IO memset Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, Oct 28, 2024, at 13:42, Julian Vetter wrote: > Thank you Arnd for your feedback and no problem. I should have asked > before, to clarify what you meant. I have now addressed what you > proposed. I have kept the iomem_copy.c and only made the minimal changes > to asm-generic/io.h and kept them in place just modifiying the content. > Not sure though about the commit message of patch 1. Let me know if I > should rephrase it. > > Signed-off-by: Julian Vetter > --- > Changes for v11: > - Restored iomem_copy.c > - Updated asm-generic/io.h to just contain the changes suggested by Arnd I've applied it to the asm-generic tree now. It's always possible to improve the commit messages, but I'll call this good enough, as it's more important to give this some time testing in linux-next. Thanks for your work work on this! Arnd