mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>
To: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.kernel.2004@gmx.net>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, Robert Love <rml@novell.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] kmem_alloc (generic wrapper for kmalloc and vmalloc)
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:17:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52k6st1v5f.fsf@topspin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <419249D8.1030100@gmx.net> (Carl-Daniel Hailfinger's message of "Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:03:20 +0100")

    Carl-Daniel> OK, so how should I allocate memory for 512 struct
    Carl-Daniel> loop_device's?  Because of its odd size (304 bytes)
    Carl-Daniel> it seems that if I use kmalloc seperately for each
    Carl-Daniel> struct, I'd waste 208 bytes per allocation. 68%
    Carl-Daniel> overhead would be a step backwards. Or am I missing
    Carl-Daniel> something here?

Would creating your own slab cache with kmem_cache_create() and
allocating with kmem_cache_alloc() work?  You can fit 13 304 byte
objects in a 4K page, which wastes 4096 - 13*304 = 144 bytes per page
or about 11 bytes per object.  Less than 4% overhead seems OK to me.

 - R.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-10 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-10  5:19 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2004-11-10  6:03 ` Robert Love
2004-11-10  6:31   ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2004-11-10  6:57     ` Robert Love
2004-11-10  7:10     ` Nick Piggin
2004-11-10 13:36     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-11-10  7:54   ` Jens Axboe
2004-11-10 17:03     ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2004-11-10 17:17       ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2004-11-10 17:54     ` Adam Heath
2004-11-10 18:04       ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52k6st1v5f.fsf@topspin.com \
    --to=roland@topspin.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=c-d.hailfinger.kernel.2004@gmx.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rml@novell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome