From: "Garg, Shivank" <shivankg@amd.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 09/12] KVM: selftests: Use proper uAPI headers to pick up mempolicy.h definitions
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 16:05:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5303684f-3acf-402a-8154-a02a2194ce34@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251016172853.52451-10-seanjc@google.com>
On 10/16/2025 10:58 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Drop the KVM's re-definitions of MPOL_xxx flags in numaif.h as they are
> defined by the already-included, kernel-provided mempolicy.h. The only
> reason the duplicate definitions don't cause compiler warnings is because
> they are identical, but only on x86-64! The syscall numbers in particular
> are subtly x86_64-specific, i.e. will cause problems if/when numaif.h is
> used outsize of x86.
>
> Opportunistically clean up the file comment as the license information is
> covered by the SPDX header, the path is superfluous, and as above the
> comment about the contents is flat out wrong.
>
> Fixes: 346b59f220a2 ("KVM: selftests: Add missing header file needed by xAPIC IPI tests")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/numaif.h | 32 +-------------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/numaif.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/numaif.h
> index aaa4ac174890..1554003c40a1 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/numaif.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/numaif.h
> @@ -1,14 +1,5 @@
> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> -/*
> - * tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/numaif.h
> - *
> - * Copyright (C) 2020, Google LLC.
> - *
> - * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2.
> - *
> - * Header file that provides access to NUMA API functions not explicitly
> - * exported to user space.
> - */
> +/* Copyright (C) 2020, Google LLC. */
Given this file got a complete overhaul in this series, Should the copyright be 2020, 2025?
Not entirely sure what the rules are for this.
LGTM!
Reviewed-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
Tested-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
>
> #ifndef SELFTEST_KVM_NUMAIF_H
> #define SELFTEST_KVM_NUMAIF_H
> @@ -37,25 +28,4 @@ KVM_SYSCALL_DEFINE(mbind, 6, void *, addr, unsigned long, size, int, mode,
> const unsigned long *, nodemask, unsigned long, maxnode,
> unsigned int, flags);
>
> -/* Policies */
> -#define MPOL_DEFAULT 0
> -#define MPOL_PREFERRED 1
> -#define MPOL_BIND 2
> -#define MPOL_INTERLEAVE 3
> -
> -#define MPOL_MAX MPOL_INTERLEAVE
> -
> -/* Flags for get_mem_policy */
> -#define MPOL_F_NODE (1<<0) /* return next il node or node of address */
> - /* Warning: MPOL_F_NODE is unsupported and
> - * subject to change. Don't use.
> - */
> -#define MPOL_F_ADDR (1<<1) /* look up vma using address */
> -#define MPOL_F_MEMS_ALLOWED (1<<2) /* query nodes allowed in cpuset */
> -
> -/* Flags for mbind */
> -#define MPOL_MF_STRICT (1<<0) /* Verify existing pages in the mapping */
> -#define MPOL_MF_MOVE (1<<1) /* Move pages owned by this process to conform to mapping */
> -#define MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL (1<<2) /* Move every page to conform to mapping */
> -
> #endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_NUMAIF_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-17 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-16 17:28 [PATCH v13 00/12] KVM: guest_memfd: Add NUMA mempolicy support Sean Christopherson
2025-10-16 17:28 ` [PATCH v13 01/12] KVM: guest_memfd: Rename "struct kvm_gmem" to "struct gmem_file" Sean Christopherson
2025-10-17 9:31 ` Garg, Shivank
2025-10-16 17:28 ` [PATCH v13 02/12] KVM: guest_memfd: Add macro to iterate over gmem_files for a mapping/inode Sean Christopherson
2025-10-17 9:34 ` Garg, Shivank
2025-10-16 17:28 ` [PATCH v13 03/12] KVM: guest_memfd: Use guest mem inodes instead of anonymous inodes Sean Christopherson
2025-10-16 17:28 ` [PATCH v13 04/12] KVM: guest_memfd: Add slab-allocated inode cache Sean Christopherson
2025-10-27 11:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-10-27 12:25 ` Garg, Shivank
2025-10-16 17:28 ` [PATCH v13 05/12] KVM: guest_memfd: Enforce NUMA mempolicy using shared policy Sean Christopherson
2025-10-16 17:28 ` [PATCH v13 06/12] KVM: selftests: Define wrappers for common syscalls to assert success Sean Christopherson
2025-10-17 9:51 ` Garg, Shivank
2025-10-16 17:28 ` [PATCH v13 07/12] KVM: selftests: Report stacktraces SIGBUS, SIGSEGV, SIGILL, and SIGFPE by default Sean Christopherson
2025-10-17 9:53 ` Garg, Shivank
2025-10-16 17:28 ` [PATCH v13 08/12] KVM: selftests: Add additional equivalents to libnuma APIs in KVM's numaif.h Sean Christopherson
2025-10-17 10:12 ` Garg, Shivank
2025-10-16 17:28 ` [PATCH v13 09/12] KVM: selftests: Use proper uAPI headers to pick up mempolicy.h definitions Sean Christopherson
2025-10-17 10:35 ` Garg, Shivank [this message]
2025-10-17 16:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-16 17:28 ` [PATCH v13 10/12] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to probe for NUMA support, and multi-node systems Sean Christopherson
2025-10-16 17:28 ` [PATCH v13 11/12] KVM: selftests: Add guest_memfd tests for mmap and NUMA policy support Sean Christopherson
2025-10-16 17:28 ` [PATCH v13 12/12] KVM: guest_memfd: Add gmem_inode.flags field instead of using i_private Sean Christopherson
2025-10-17 11:01 ` Garg, Shivank
2025-10-16 18:08 ` [PATCH v13 00/12] KVM: guest_memfd: Add NUMA mempolicy support Miguel Ojeda
2025-10-16 20:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-16 21:07 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-10-16 23:57 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-10-17 0:09 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-10-17 16:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-20 16:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-21 5:59 ` Garg, Shivank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5303684f-3acf-402a-8154-a02a2194ce34@amd.com \
--to=shivankg@amd.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®