From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753842AbaB0SQV (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:16:21 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:59391 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753234AbaB0SQS (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:16:18 -0500 Message-ID: <530F80ED.1040509@infradead.org> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:16:13 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomi Valkeinen , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: Laurent Pinchart , Geert Uytterhoeven , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , David Airlie , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Reorder drivers/video directory References: <1393502086-9433-1-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <1393502086-9433-1-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/27/2014 03:54 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Hi, > > This is a re-send of the series, with RFC removed from the subject, and a bunch > of acks added. > > I'm cc'ing more people, to make sure this doesn't come as a surprise, and to > make sure this is not a bad idea, doomed to fail horribly. What does this patch apply to? I can't get it to apply cleanly to -rc4 or Linus's current git tree. I like what I see so far. Thanks. > So this series creates a new directory, drivers/video/fbdev/, to which all > fbdev related files are moved. Also, a new directory, drivers/video/fbdev/core/ > is created, to which the core fbdev framework files are moved. This makes the > drivers/video hierarchy much more clear. > > Presuming no one has objections to this as such, I wonder what's the least > painful way to merge this? Normally, like any other fbdev change? As a separate > pull request, maybe at -rc2 time frame, based on -rc1? Something else? -- ~Randy