From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
To: "Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Fix the docs build with Sphinx 6.0
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 10:06:38 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530a54b6-25b2-4892-40bc-809371689aae@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c84fe7eb-27b7-aca7-24a6-09ca67dca43f@suse.cz>
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 17:22:42 +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 1/12/23 00:13, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 00:17:11 +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
>>> On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 15:14:46 +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>> Hi.
>>>>
>>>> I can confirm the regression, I bisected Sphinx revision that caused that
>>>> and filled an upstream issues:
>>>> https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/11116
>>>
>>> Thank you Martin for looking into this!
>>
>> Thanks to Martin's inputs on the github issue, Sphinx 6.1.3 has released
>> and the issue is resolved for parallel builds.
>
> You're welcome.
>
>>
>> However, for non-parallel builds, the memory hog still remains.
>> Again, this is a table comparing 5.3.0, 6.1.2, and 6.1.3.
>>
>> ====== =================================== ===============================
>> elapsed time maxresident
>> ----------------------------------- -------------------------------
>> Sphinx -j1 -j2 -j4 -j6 -j1 -j2 -j4 -j6
>> ====== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======= ======= ======= =======
>> 6.1.3 15:03.83 11:31.99 9:35.15 8:49.01 2949056 1059516 978232 967400
>> 6.1.2 15:11.74 18:06.89 16:39.93 OOM 2961524 5548344 5255372 --
>> 5.3.0 14:13.04 10:16.81 8:22.37 8:09.74 711532 937660 846016 800340
>> ====== =================================== ===============================
>
> I thank you for the nice numbers you provided.
You are welcome.
>
>>
>> Note:
>> - The -j1 run needs an explicit option given to sphinx-build:
>> make SPHINXOPTS="-q -j1" htmldocs
>>
>> I naively assumed that the memory hog would be resolved all together,
>> but that's not the case.
>
> Yep, I would expect that same.
>
>>
>> Martin, could you report the remaining issue to upstream Sphinx?
>
> Sure: https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/11124
Thanks!
>
> Btw. do you have an Github account I can CC?
I have reacted with an emoji and subscribed to the issue.
Thanks, Akira
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
>>
>> Thanks, Akira
>>
>>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-14 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-04 20:45 Jonathan Corbet
2023-01-07 5:17 ` Akira Yokosawa
2023-01-08 14:01 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-01-09 14:14 ` Martin Liška
2023-01-09 15:17 ` Akira Yokosawa
2023-01-11 23:13 ` Akira Yokosawa
2023-01-12 16:22 ` Martin Liška
2023-01-14 1:06 ` Akira Yokosawa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530a54b6-25b2-4892-40bc-809371689aae@gmail.com \
--to=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mliska@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®