mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: Metin.Kaya@arm.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, bsegall@google.com,
	 daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, dave@stgolabs.net,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,  joelaf@google.com,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, kernel-team@android.com,
	 kprateek.nayak@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	longman@redhat.com,  mgorman@suse.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	paulmck@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, 	qyousef@layalina.io,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
		vincent.guittot@linaro.org, vschneid@redhat.com,
	will@kernel.org, 	xuewen.yan94@gmail.com, zezeozue@google.com,
	spasswolf@web.de
Subject: Re: commit 894d1b3db41c leads to frequent hangs when booting
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 11:31:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5325ccfa4f7a0a9925e8133612528237966c2145.camel@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANDhNCrKhwVBEjX5m46Mwrm9uixBkS8MSXKyWxkD=-8Urx7nGg@mail.gmail.com>

Am Mittwoch, dem 11.12.2024 um 23:40 -0800 schrieb John Stultz:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 6:41 PM John Stultz <jstultz@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 4:17 PM Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de> wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, dem 11.12.2024 um 15:14 -0800 schrieb John Stultz:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 2:46 PM Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Am Mittwoch, dem 11.12.2024 um 22:35 +0100 schrieb Bert Karwatzki:
> > > > > > I have confirmed that I that linux-next-20241210 is fixed by the same revert
> > > > > > as v6.13-rc2 (ten boots without incident is the criterion for a good commit)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bert Karwatzki
> > > > >
> > > > > Also this bug only occurs with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y, I've just checked v6.13-rc2
> > > > > without the revert and the following preempt settings and got 10 clean boots:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hrm. That matches the case where the fix here helped:
> > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=82f9cc094975240885c93effbca7f4603f5de1bf
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm still working on getting a minimal delta from your config booting
> > > > in my environment, but in the meantime, I'd be curious if the
> > > > following reduced revert helps?
> > > >   https://github.com/johnstultz-work/linux-dev/commit/60c60f85670fb1f4708adbe55e15ab918d96f9f0
> > > >
> > > > Basically just trying to clarify if the problem is moving the wakeup
> > > > to the wake_q or if some other interaction (maybe with the
> > > > preempt_disables) could be causing the issue.
> > > > (I'm assuming you have 82f9cc094975 applied when you test with that change)
> > > >
> > >
> > > I tested linux-next-20241210 (which includes 82f9cc094975) with your patch
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
> > > index 37f025a096c9..724d4c871cf6 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
> > > +++ b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
> > > @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ __ww_mutex_die(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_WAITER
> > > *waiter,
> > >  #ifndef WW_RT
> > >                 debug_mutex_wake_waiter(lock, waiter);
> > >  #endif
> > > -               wake_q_add(wake_q, waiter->task);
> > > +               wake_up_process(waiter->task);
> > >         }
> > >
> > >         return true;
> > > @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static bool __ww_mutex_wound(struct MUTEX *lock,
> > >                  * wakeup pending to re-read the wounded state.
> > >                  */
> > >                 if (owner != current)
> > > -                       wake_q_add(wake_q, owner);
> > > +                       wake_up_process(owner);
> > >
> > >                 return true;
> > >         }
> > >
> > > and this fixes the issue for me.
> >
> > Ok, thanks for validating that!  Hrm. Ok, I suspect I'm missing a path
> > in rtmutex.c that calls into __schedule() before we pop up to the
> > point where we actually wake the wake_q.
> >
> > I may have found one or two spots that look likely, and I believe I've
> > also managed to reproduce your problem using the test-ww_mutex driver.
> >
> > So I'm working up a proper patch and will share for testing here soon.
>
> Ok, could you try the patch here:
> https://github.com/johnstultz-work/linux-dev/commit/3c902b92c88122cd034937e8d40930bac254a7c5
>
> I've repushed to the test branch I shared earlier, so its against
> 6.13-rc2 + fix that has landed upstream + test fix above ( + another
> patch that makes stressing the ww_mutexes easier):
> https://github.com/johnstultz-work/linux-dev/commits/debug/894d1b3db41c-hang-bert/
>
> Let me know if you still have issues with this.
> thanks
> -john

I cherry-picked your two patches on top of linux-next-20241210:

2029cb31eae9 (HEAD -> master) MAYBEFIX: Make sure we wake anything on the wake_q
when we release the lock->wait_lock
b525e4779098 test-ww_mutex: Allow test to be run (and re-run) from userland
1b2ab8149928 (tag: next-20241210) Add linux-next specific files for 20241210

This fixes the issue for me.

Bert Karwatzki


  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-12 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-11 21:35 Bert Karwatzki
2024-12-11 22:46 ` Bert Karwatzki
2024-12-11 23:14   ` John Stultz
2024-12-12  0:16     ` Bert Karwatzki
2024-12-12  2:41       ` John Stultz
2024-12-12  7:40         ` John Stultz
2024-12-12 10:31           ` Bert Karwatzki [this message]
2024-12-12 11:56             ` Bert Karwatzki
2024-12-12 12:14               ` Bert Karwatzki
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-12-11 18:25 Bert Karwatzki
2024-12-11 19:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-12-11 20:27   ` John Stultz
2024-12-11 20:43     ` Bert Karwatzki
2024-12-11 21:08       ` John Stultz
2024-12-11 20:28   ` Bert Karwatzki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5325ccfa4f7a0a9925e8133612528237966c2145.camel@web.de \
    --to=spasswolf@web.de \
    --cc=Metin.Kaya@arm.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xuewen.yan94@gmail.com \
    --cc=zezeozue@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®