mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Perkel <mperkel@yahoo.com>
To: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AMD Quad Core clock problem?
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:40:57 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <533265.33722.qm@web52505.mail.re2.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47FFD3F3.50107@redhat.com>


--- Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com> wrote:

> Marc Perkel wrote:
> > --- Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Marc Perkel wrote:
> >>> I was just wondering if there were any known
> >> issues
> >>> with AMD quad core phenom clock drift problems?
> >> I';m
> >>> running a 2.6.24 kernel and it's losing time. I
> >>> remember the first dual core AMD chips had a lot
> >> of
> >>> clock issues.
> >>>
> >>> If this is something new let me know what
> >> information
> >>> to check and post to this list.
> >> When reporting clock problems, please post dmesg.
> 
> >> This has all the 
> >> interesting timekeeping-related log messages from
> >> the kernel.  Please 
> >> also describe the drift quantitatively.
> >>
> >> -- Chris
> >>
> > 
> > OK - thanks Chris.
> > 
> > The drift is small. It loses a few seconds every
> hour.
> > And it might not be kernel related. I just
> remembered
> > the early dual core days when this took months to
> get
> > right. I'm running several dual core computers and
> the
> > only one drifting is the quad. All are running the
> > same OS and kernel.
> 
> With the older chips, each core had its own TSC,
> which caused 
> synchronization problems.  The Barcelona generation
> chips (including 
> your Phenom) have a constant frequency TSC on the
> northbridge, so they 
> should be immune to these problems.
> 
> If it's steadily losing a few seconds every hour,
> it's probably just 
> slightly mis-calibrated hardware.  ntp should fix
> this right up.  If the 
> drift is more extreme than ntp can correct for, or
> the drift keeps 
> changing, or time is jumping around, that is
> definitely something that 
> could be a bug.
> 
> > hpet clockevent registered
> > TSC calibrated against HPET
> > Marking TSC unstable due to TSCs unsynchronized
> 
> It's possible that in future kernels we'll be a few
> clock cycles more 
> accurate in calibrating this on Barcelona chips, but
> calibration is only 
> as good as the standard of comparison.  There will
> always be hardware 
> that's slightly off, so run ntp, or use a nightly
> ntpdate cronjob.  If 
> your time starts drifting drastically or jumping
> around, please yell 
> really loud.
> 
> -- Chris
> 

The chip I'm talking about is the Phenom chip. It's
the AMD 9600 and the MB is an ASUS M3A78-EMH.

Been toying with NTPD all weekend and the drift is
such that it's just barely out of the range of NTP to
correct it. Sometime if I sync the clock on startup it
will work for a while but always falls back to the
internal clock. I'm estimating it's losing 3-4 minutes
a day. I also verified that I have the latest bios.

It is possible that I have bad hardware but I doubt
it. I think I might go ahead and start a bug report on
this and see if this is just me or if anyone else is
having these kind of problems as well. Just wanted to
get a little feedback first to make sure I'm not doing
something stupid.


Marc Perkel
Junk Email Filter dot com
http://www.junkemailfilter.com


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-14 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-11 18:27 Marc Perkel
2008-04-11 18:35 ` H. Willstrand
2008-04-11 18:38 ` Chris Snook
2008-04-11 20:28   ` Marc Perkel
2008-04-11 21:11     ` Chris Snook
2008-04-11 21:36       ` Marc Perkel
2008-04-11 21:38         ` Lennart Sorensen
2008-04-13 19:35           ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-14 15:12             ` Lennart Sorensen
2008-04-14 16:23               ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-14 16:29                 ` Lennart Sorensen
2008-04-15  1:11               ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-15  1:24                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-15  1:45                   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-15  2:40                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-11 21:46         ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-11 22:09       ` Marc Perkel
2008-04-13  8:19         ` Bart Van Assche
2008-04-12  1:04       ` Marc Perkel
2008-04-14 19:16         ` Chris Snook
2008-04-14 20:46           ` Marc Perkel
2008-04-15  6:11           ` Bart Van Assche
2008-04-16 21:44             ` Marc Perkel
2008-04-17  6:17               ` Bart Van Assche
2008-04-17 18:03                 ` Marc Perkel
2008-04-18 11:56                   ` Bart Van Assche
2008-06-17 21:09           ` Marc Perkel
2008-04-14 13:40       ` Marc Perkel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=533265.33722.qm@web52505.mail.re2.yahoo.com \
    --to=mperkel@yahoo.com \
    --cc=csnook@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome