From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: acme@ghostprotocols.net, paulus@samba.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: sched: possible deadlock between fair sched and perf
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:11:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53343FA5.2080100@oracle.com> (raw)
Hi all,
While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest running latest -next
kernel I've stumbled on the following:
[ 2248.545285] ======================================================
[ 2248.546809] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 2248.548540] 3.14.0-rc8-next-20140326-sasha-00018-gffbc974-dirty #285 Not tainted
[ 2248.550180] -------------------------------------------------------
[ 2248.550180] trinity-c47/15728 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 2248.550180] (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: unregister_fair_sched_group (kernel/sched/fair.c:7536)
[ 2248.550180]
[ 2248.550180] but task is already holding lock:
[ 2248.550180] (&ctx->lock){-.-...}, at: perf_event_exit_task (kernel/events/core.c:7415 kernel/events/core.c:7492)
[ 2248.550180]
[ 2248.550180] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 2248.550180]
[ 2248.550180]
[ 2248.550180] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 2248.550180]
-> #1 (&ctx->lock){-.-...}:
[ 2248.550180] lock_acquire (arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:14 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3602)
[ 2248.550180] _raw_spin_lock (include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:143 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:151)
[ 2248.550180] __perf_event_task_sched_out (kernel/events/core.c:2340 kernel/events/core.c:2366)
[ 2248.550180] perf_event_task_sched_out (include/linux/perf_event.h:689)
[ 2248.550180] __schedule (kernel/sched/core.c:2064 kernel/sched/core.c:2102 kernel/sched/core.c:2226 kernel/sched/core.c:2713)
[ 2248.550180] preempt_schedule_irq (arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:814 kernel/sched/core.c:2829)
[ 2248.550180] retint_kernel (arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:1111)
[ 2248.550180] syscall_trace_leave (arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c:1535)
[ 2248.550180] int_check_syscall_exit_work (arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:797)
[ 2248.550180]
-> #0 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}:
[ 2248.550180] __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1840 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1945 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2131 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3182)
[ 2248.550180] lock_acquire (arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:14 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3602)
[ 2248.550180] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave (include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:117 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:159)
[ 2248.550180] unregister_fair_sched_group (kernel/sched/fair.c:7536)
[ 2248.550180] sched_offline_group (include/linux/cpumask.h:173 kernel/sched/core.c:7203)
[ 2248.550180] sched_autogroup_exit (kernel/sched/auto_group.c:39 include/linux/kref.h:74 include/linux/kref.h:99 kernel/sched/auto_group.c:44 kernel/sched/auto_group.c:186)
[ 2248.550180] __put_task_struct (kernel/fork.c:228 kernel/fork.c:234 kernel/fork.c:247)
[ 2248.550180] put_ctx (include/linux/sched.h:1807 kernel/events/core.c:896)
[ 2248.550180] perf_event_exit_task (kernel/events/core.c:905 kernel/events/core.c:7422 kernel/events/core.c:7492)
[ 2248.550180] do_exit (kernel/exit.c:801)
[ 2248.550180] do_group_exit (kernel/exit.c:919)
[ 2248.550180] SyS_exit_group (kernel/exit.c:930)
[ 2248.550180] tracesys (arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:749)
[ 2248.550180]
[ 2248.550180] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 2248.550180]
[ 2248.550180] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 2248.550180]
[ 2248.550180] CPU0 CPU1
[ 2248.550180] ---- ----
[ 2248.550180] lock(&ctx->lock);
[ 2248.550180] lock(&rq->lock);
[ 2248.550180] lock(&ctx->lock);
[ 2248.550180] lock(&rq->lock);
[ 2248.550180]
[ 2248.550180] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 2248.550180]
[ 2248.550180] 1 lock held by trinity-c47/15728:
[ 2248.550180] #0: (&ctx->lock){-.-...}, at: perf_event_exit_task (kernel/events/core.c:7415 kernel/events/core.c:7492)
[ 2248.550180]
[ 2248.550180] stack backtrace:
[ 2248.550180] CPU: 31 PID: 15728 Comm: trinity-c47 Not tainted 3.14.0-rc8-next-20140326-sasha-00018-gffbc974-dirty #285
[ 2248.550180] ffffffffb19711d0 ffff88056563bb78 ffffffffae4b5057 0000000000000000
[ 2248.550180] ffffffffb19711d0 ffff88056563bbc8 ffffffffae4a7b57 0000000000000001
[ 2248.550180] ffff88056563bc58 ffff88056563bbc8 ffff880553f20cf0 ffff880553f20d28
[ 2248.550180] Call Trace:
[ 2248.550180] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:52)
[ 2248.550180] print_circular_bug (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1216)
[ 2248.550180] __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1840 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1945 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2131 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3182)
[ 2248.550180] ? sched_clock (arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:192 arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c:305)
[ 2248.550180] ? sched_clock_local (kernel/sched/clock.c:214)
[ 2248.550180] ? __slab_free (include/linux/spinlock.h:358 mm/slub.c:2632)
[ 2248.550180] ? debug_smp_processor_id (lib/smp_processor_id.c:57)
[ 2248.550180] lock_acquire (arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:14 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3602)
[ 2248.550180] ? unregister_fair_sched_group (kernel/sched/fair.c:7536)
[ 2248.550180] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave (include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:109 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:159)
[ 2248.550180] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave (include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:117 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:159)
[ 2248.550180] ? unregister_fair_sched_group (kernel/sched/fair.c:7536)
[ 2248.550180] unregister_fair_sched_group (kernel/sched/fair.c:7536)
[ 2248.550180] sched_offline_group (include/linux/cpumask.h:173 kernel/sched/core.c:7203)
[ 2248.550180] sched_autogroup_exit (kernel/sched/auto_group.c:39 include/linux/kref.h:74 include/linux/kref.h:99 kernel/sched/auto_group.c:44 kernel/sched/auto_group.c:186)
[ 2248.550180] __put_task_struct (kernel/fork.c:228 kernel/fork.c:234 kernel/fork.c:247)
[ 2248.550180] put_ctx (include/linux/sched.h:1807 kernel/events/core.c:896)
[ 2248.550180] perf_event_exit_task (kernel/events/core.c:905 kernel/events/core.c:7422 kernel/events/core.c:7492)
[ 2248.550180] do_exit (kernel/exit.c:801)
[ 2248.550180] do_group_exit (kernel/exit.c:919)
[ 2248.550180] SyS_exit_group (kernel/exit.c:930)
[ 2248.550180] tracesys (arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:749)
Thanks,
Sasha
next reply other threads:[~2014-03-27 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-27 15:11 Sasha Levin [this message]
2014-03-27 15:33 ` Sasha Levin
2014-04-01 1:12 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53343FA5.2080100@oracle.com \
--to=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome