From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Adding interrupt support to gpio-ich driver (possibly via SCI)
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 20:21:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53436B1C.8010102@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140408024851.GA3594@srcf.ucam.org>
On 04/07/2014 07:48 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 09:25:50AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
>> Is there a clean way to use any of those to implement interrupt support
>> for this driver ? I thought about hijacking the SCI interrupt by registering
>> an interrupt handler with acpi_install_sci_handler(), but that would restrict
>> the driver to kernel only (or the acpi function would have to be exported),
>> and I have no idea if it would work or, more importantly, if it would be
>> the best approach to solve the problem, or if the result would be acceptable.
>> I can figure out the "working" part, but that would not help much if I would
>> have to carry the patch locally because it is not acceptable for upstream
>> integration.
>
> You shouldn't need to install an SCI handler - the way the hardware will
> generate an SCI is to raise a GPE. If you know which GPE the device
> raises (my recollection is that for most Intel chipsets it's GPIO number
> + 0x10) then you can just call acpi_install_gpe_handler(). The problem
Sounds good. Do you by any chance have a pointer to some documentation
explaining this in some more detail ?
> is that the firmware may well already be using some of those GPIOs, and
> there's no easy way to tell. Checking the interrupt configuration isn't
> sufficient, since some of them may just be used as outputs.
>
The gpio-ich driver already has some magic to detect that condition - I
noticed that I can not request all GPIO pins on all hardware. Either case,
the gpio pins I am interested in are well defined on the hardware I am
dealing with, so I can be sure I won't step on some unexpected use.
Thanks!
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-08 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-04 16:25 Guenter Roeck
2014-04-08 2:48 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-04-08 3:21 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2014-04-08 3:31 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-04-08 4:02 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53436B1C.8010102@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=ptyser@xes-inc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome