From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<x86@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"open list:X86 PLATFORM DRIVERS - ARCH"
<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: supply: olpc_battery: remove unnecessary CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:04:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5350ef53-cf70-c4b6-cdf8-5738e9d4b10a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201029074100.225806-1-coiby.xu@gmail.com>
Hi,
On 10/29/20 8:41 AM, Coiby Xu wrote:
> SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS has already took good care of CONFIG_PM_CONFIG.
No it does not, when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set then the
SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS macro which SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS uses
is a no-op, so nothing will reference xo15_sci_resume leading to
a compiler warning when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set.
You could drop the ifdef and add __maybe_unused to the definition
of xo15_sci_resume, but that feels like needless churn, best to
just keep this as is IMHO.
Also s/CONFIG_PM_CONFIG/CONFIG_PM_SLEEP/ in the commit message.
Regards,
Hans
>
> Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc-xo15-sci.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc-xo15-sci.c b/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc-xo15-sci.c
> index 85f4638764d6..716eefd735a4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc-xo15-sci.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc-xo15-sci.c
> @@ -192,7 +192,6 @@ static int xo15_sci_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> static int xo15_sci_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> /* Enable all EC events */
> @@ -204,7 +203,6 @@ static int xo15_sci_resume(struct device *dev)
>
> return 0;
> }
> -#endif
>
> static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(xo15_sci_pm, NULL, xo15_sci_resume);
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-29 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-29 7:41 Coiby Xu
2020-10-29 10:04 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2020-10-29 10:59 ` Coiby Xu
2020-10-29 11:09 ` Hans de Goede
2020-10-29 14:16 ` Coiby Xu
2020-10-29 16:03 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5350ef53-cf70-c4b6-cdf8-5738e9d4b10a@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=coiby.xu@gmail.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®