From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org, chenyuan_fl@163.com
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
chenyuan@kylinos.cn, daniel@iogearbox.net, jolsa@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
memxor@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
martin.lau@kernel.org, clm@meta.com, ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf: Fix kfunc implicit arg inject type detection to prevent invalid pointer deref
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2026 12:32:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <535798105630b24033f33f532051b93dc853bc0d.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6d10d44ee132d70b2b2633790663289af944fd8d3889440dfc55fea04c5a2e5@mail.kernel.org>
On Mon, 2026-06-01 at 07:42 +0000, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
> > bpf: Fix kfunc implicit arg inject type detection to prevent invalid pointer deref
> >
> > When a module kfunc declares an implicit struct bpf_prog_aux * argument,
> > the verifier must identify it so the kernel injects env->prog->aux into
> > the correct register at runtime. The original check used
> > is_kfunc_arg_prog_aux() which calls btf_types_are_same() to compare the
> > module BTF type against vmlinux.
> >
> > Root Cause
> > ----------
> >
> > This issue was triggered by pahole 1.30 generating module BTF with
> > incorrect type information, which caused the kernel's distilled base
> > BTF deduplication for modules to fail. As a result, the module retained
> > its own copy of struct bpf_prog_aux with a different BTF ID than
> > vmlinux's definition. While pahole 1.31 fixed the BTF generation issue,
> > the kernel must be robust against such inconsistencies: a BTF mismatch
> > should result in a clean rejection, not a kernel crash or information
> > disclosure.
> >
> > When the distilled base dedup fails and btf_types_are_same() cannot
> > match the module's bpf_prog_aux type against vmlinux's,
> > is_kfunc_arg_prog_aux() returned false and the code fell through
> > silently without setting arg_prog. The kfunc then received whatever
> > value was in the argument register and dereferenced it as a
> > bpf_prog_aux pointer, leading to:
> >
> > BUG: kernel invalid pointer dereference, address: 00000000000009e2
> > RIP: bpf_prog_get_assoc_struct_ops+0xa/0xc0
> > RDI: 0x000000000000046d (stale register value)
> >
> > In the observed crash the stale value was the process PID, causing a
> > dereference within the unmapped NULL page. However, an attacker able
> > to control the register value -- for example by writing a BPF program
> > that explicitly sets R2 before calling a KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS kfunc --
> > could redirect the dereference to arbitrary kernel memory, turning
> > this into an information disclosure. The fix ensures the verifier
> > either validates and injects the correct bpf_prog_aux pointer, or
> > rejects the program outright -- no silent fallthrough that could
> > be exploited.
>
> This looks like a fix for a real bug, but it does not carry a Fixes:
> tag. Should it point at the change that introduced the implicit
> prog_aux argument handling, is_kfunc_arg_prog_aux() and KF_ARG_PROG_AUX_ID?
>
> That code appears to come from "bpf: Support __magic prog_aux arguments
> for kfuncs" (Ihor Solodrai, lore message-id
> 20251029190113.3323406-5-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev).
>
> The merged SHA could not be resolved from this repository, so the tag
> would need to be filled in by hand, for example:
>
> Fixes: <sha> ("bpf: Support __magic prog_aux arguments for kfuncs")
>
>
> ---
> AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
> See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
>
> CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/26740141551
The robot (and b4 utility as well) is confused by the following
formatting quirk:
> ...
> Fix
> ---
> ...
The triple dash marks the start of the diff section of the patch.
Hence, when I apply this series the commit message is truncated after
this point.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-01 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-07 8:09 [PATCH] bpf: fix btf_types_are_same for cross-BTF type comparison chenyuan_fl
2026-04-07 8:58 ` Leon Hwang
2026-04-07 9:01 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-07 11:19 ` Alan Maguire
2026-05-15 18:27 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-06-01 6:46 ` [PATCH bpf v2 0/2] bpf: Fix kfunc implicit arg injection and add selftest chenyuan_fl
2026-06-01 6:46 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf: Fix kfunc implicit arg inject type detection to prevent invalid pointer deref chenyuan_fl
2026-06-01 7:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-01 19:32 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2026-06-02 8:58 ` [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Fix kfunc implicit arg injection and add selftest chenyuan_fl
2026-06-02 8:58 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf: Fix kfunc implicit arg inject type detection to prevent invalid pointer deref chenyuan_fl
2026-06-02 9:44 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-02 18:52 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-06-04 9:14 ` chenyuan
2026-06-04 10:21 ` Alan Maguire
2026-06-09 0:46 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-06-02 8:58 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add regression test for kfunc implicit arg injection chenyuan_fl
2026-06-02 9:44 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-02 9:38 ` [PATCH bpf v4 0/2] bpf: Fix kfunc implicit arg injection and add selftest chenyuan_fl
2026-06-02 9:38 ` [PATCH bpf v4 1/2] bpf: Fix kfunc implicit arg inject type detection to prevent invalid pointer deref chenyuan_fl
2026-06-02 10:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05 0:42 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-02 9:38 ` [PATCH bpf v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add regression test for kfunc implicit arg injection chenyuan_fl
2026-06-02 10:27 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-02 17:36 ` kernel test robot
2026-06-02 18:37 ` kernel test robot
2026-06-05 1:29 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-08 14:26 ` [PATCH bpf v5 0/2] bpf: Fix kfunc implicit arg injection and add selftest chenyuan_fl
2026-06-08 14:26 ` [PATCH bpf v5 1/2] bpf: Fix kfunc implicit arg inject type detection to prevent invalid pointer deref chenyuan_fl
2026-06-08 14:52 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 17:28 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-09 0:54 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-06-09 1:00 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-09 1:18 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-06-09 6:20 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-08 14:26 ` [PATCH bpf v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: strengthen bpf_kfunc_implicit_arg to verify aux injection chenyuan_fl
2026-06-08 17:34 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-09 0:59 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-06-08 19:58 ` [PATCH bpf v5 0/2] bpf: Fix kfunc implicit arg injection and add selftest Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-09 12:52 ` [PATCH bpf v6 " chenyuan_fl
2026-06-09 12:52 ` [PATCH bpf v6 1/2] bpf: Fix kfunc implicit arg inject type detection to prevent invalid pointer deref chenyuan_fl
2026-06-09 13:32 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-09 16:39 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-09 12:52 ` [PATCH bpf v6 2/2] selftests/bpf: strengthen bpf_kfunc_implicit_arg to verify aux injection chenyuan_fl
2026-06-01 17:12 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf: Fix kfunc implicit arg inject type detection to prevent invalid pointer deref Yonghong Song
2026-06-01 21:36 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-01 6:46 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add regression test for kfunc implicit arg injection with stale register chenyuan_fl
2026-06-01 17:17 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=535798105630b24033f33f532051b93dc853bc0d.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenyuan@kylinos.cn \
--cc=chenyuan_fl@163.com \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®