From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: mark gross <640e9920@gmail.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arve@smtp1.linux-foundation.org,
Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] PM: Make it possible to avoid wakeup events from being lost
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:28:29 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53596.65110.qm@web180310.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201006280159.10885.rjw@sisk.pl>
Did someone post the canonical driver changes
to make use of this? Something like
suspend() { /* if wake-enabled, up count */ }
resume() { /* if upcounted, downcount */ }
is what first comes to mind.. expecting that
the suspend/resume methods in the driver are
already doing the right things for enabling
and later disabling the "system wake" behavior
on the various relevant hardware events...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-28 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-26 13:14 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-27 15:50 ` Alan Stern
2010-06-27 23:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-28 14:16 ` Alan Stern
2010-06-28 19:01 ` [update] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-28 19:11 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-06-28 19:19 ` Alan Stern
2010-06-28 21:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-28 20:38 ` Greg KH
2010-06-30 7:10 ` Florian Mickler
2010-06-30 13:47 ` mark gross
2010-06-30 18:00 ` Alan Stern
2010-06-30 19:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-30 19:58 ` Alan Stern
2010-06-30 23:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-01 13:58 ` Alan Stern
2010-07-01 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-01 20:44 ` Alan Stern
2010-07-01 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-28 23:28 ` David Brownell [this message]
2010-06-29 19:57 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2010-06-27 22:28 ` mark gross
2010-06-28 12:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-29 4:43 ` mark gross
2010-07-01 13:32 ` Pavel Machek
2010-07-01 15:08 ` Florian Mickler
2010-07-01 19:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-02 18:14 ` Pavel Machek
2010-07-02 19:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-26 16:54 [linux-pm] " David Brownell
2010-06-26 17:14 ` Alan Stern
2010-06-26 18:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-26 19:58 ` Alan Stern
2010-06-27 2:43 ` David Brownell
2010-06-27 3:06 ` Alan Stern
2010-06-26 18:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53596.65110.qm@web180310.mail.gq1.yahoo.com \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=640e9920@gmail.com \
--cc=Arve@smtp1.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=florian@mickler.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome