From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, matthew.garrett@nebula.com,
dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 12/12] ACPI: introduce .handle_children flag for acpi scan handler
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 22:34:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <535EBB5B.4000004@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398650870.2443.22.camel@rzhang1-mobl4>
On 4/28/2014 4:07 AM, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 00:26 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 12:06:59 AM Zhang Rui wrote:
>>> For some devices with scan handler attached, their children devices
>>> are enumerated by the scan handler, indirectly.
>> This isn't the case really. They are enumerated by bus controller drivers
>> for the buses they are on.
>>
> that's what I mean by saying "indirectly". :)
>
>>> In this case, we do not want to enumerate the children devices in
>>> acpi scan code explicitly.
>>>
>>> Thus a new flag .handle_children is introduced in this patch.
>>>
>>> For scan handlers with this flag set, we will do default enumeration neither
>>> for the attached devices nor for the children of the attached devices.
>> I'm not sure if that is the right approach. I would prefer that to be
>> handled in a more fine-graind manner, like a flag per device ID or something
>> similar?
>>
> hmmm, how about this,
> first, keep the device->flags.no_child_enumeration flag introduced in
> this patch
> second, set the flag explicitly, for specified devices, in the scan
> handler .attach() function.
But then it could simply clear the platform_id flag for them, couldn't it?
Rafael
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-28 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-07 16:06 [PATCH V5 00/12] ACPI: change the way of enumerating PNPACPI/Platform devices Zhang Rui
2014-04-07 16:06 ` [PATCH V5 01/12] ACPI: introduce .match() callback for ACPI scan handler Zhang Rui
2014-04-07 16:06 ` [PATCH V5 02/12] PNPACPI: use whilte list for pnpacpi device enumeration Zhang Rui
2014-04-27 22:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-28 1:40 ` Zhang Rui
2014-04-28 20:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-28 20:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-04-07 16:06 ` [PATCH V5 03/12] ACPI: remove ids that does not comply with the ACPI PNP id rule Zhang Rui
2014-04-07 16:06 ` [PATCH V5 04/12] ACPI: remove unsupported serial PNP ids from acpi pnp scan handler id lsit Zhang Rui
2014-04-07 16:06 ` [PATCH V5 05/12] ACPI: check and enumerate CMOS RTC devices explicitly Zhang Rui
2014-04-27 22:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-27 22:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-28 1:50 ` Zhang Rui
2014-04-07 16:06 ` [PATCH V5 06/12] ACPI: introduce platform_id flag Zhang Rui
2014-04-27 22:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-28 1:51 ` Zhang Rui
2014-04-07 16:06 ` [PATCH V5 07/12] ACPI: use platform bus as the default bus for _HID enumeration Zhang Rui
2014-04-07 16:06 ` [PATCH V5 08/12] ACPI: introduce dummy lpss scan handler Zhang Rui
2014-04-27 22:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-28 1:57 ` Zhang Rui
2014-04-07 16:06 ` [PATCH V5 09/12] ACPI: introduce acpi platform exclude id list Zhang Rui
2014-04-27 22:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-28 1:57 ` Zhang Rui
2014-04-28 20:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-07 16:06 ` [PATCH V5 10/12] ACPI: introduce dummy container scan handler Zhang Rui
2014-04-07 16:06 ` [PATCH V5 11/12] ACPI: introduce dummy memory hotplug " Zhang Rui
2014-04-07 16:06 ` [PATCH V5 12/12] ACPI: introduce .handle_children flag for acpi " Zhang Rui
2014-04-27 22:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-28 2:07 ` Zhang Rui
2014-04-28 20:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=535EBB5B.4000004@intel.com \
--to=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome