From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6549BC433DB for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 09:01:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C7164DEE for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 09:01:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230329AbhBIJBI (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 04:01:08 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:58066 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229891AbhBII6G (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 03:58:06 -0500 IronPort-SDR: nIf9ZSCQco600GEwbKOGJ2u10nNRQdXvQKCgD/99ITdV+aYnmkgGSS6YGDqzj0gu+aAJn75DaR T7id+gM7vBOg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9889"; a="266684592" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,164,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="266684592" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2021 00:57:46 -0800 IronPort-SDR: jS6fqE6CFHTv8+2qp9aMc0TJVcgVwSflAoyHxTBq5ljJK8sbgJ2FX02Iimi6jE7zlejl2rl6Fs A2JPXGTbFmkg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,164,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="436016444" Received: from shao2-debian.sh.intel.com (HELO [10.239.13.11]) ([10.239.13.11]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2021 00:57:42 -0800 Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [patch 06/12] x86/entry: Convert system vectors to irq stack macro To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Peter Zijlstra , kernel test robot , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , kbuild-all@lists.01.org, x86@kernel.org, Kees Cook References: <20210204211154.713523041@linutronix.de> <202102051148.WIj5O4Ry-lkp@intel.com> <20210208141957.GA18227@zn.tnic> From: Rong Chen Message-ID: <536a6b24-fadb-cb2a-8259-dadd3730c6ce@intel.com> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:57:09 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210208141957.GA18227@zn.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/8/21 10:19 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 04:15:11PM +0800, Rong Chen wrote: >> Thanks for the advice, we'll add the check to our cluster, >> and sorry for the inconvenience. > When it comes to the tip tree, I'd say you guys are much better off not > scraping any patches from the mailing list but simply testing the tip > branches. That would be more than enough and you already do that anyway. > > Thx. > Hi Borislav, Thanks for the help, how can we identify the patches for tip tree, could you please guide us? Best Regards, Rong Chen