Re: [PATCH] PM: ARM: sa1111: Drop suspend and resume bus type callbacks

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>]

On Saturday, October 14, 2017 4:43:51 PM CEST Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:09:42PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> > <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:37:40PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> > >> <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> > >> > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:47:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >> >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> None of the sa1111 drivers in the tree implements the suspend and
> > >> >> resume callbacks from struct sa1111_driver, so drop them and drop
> > >> >> the corresponding callbacks from sa1111_bus_type.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > >> >
> > >> > This will conflict with some patches I have - would you like me to queue
> > >> > it along with my changes?
> > >>
> > >> Yes, please.
> > >>
> > >> >  When would you like to get this merged?
> > >>
> > >> When possible. :-)
> > >>
> > >> I would like to drop the legacy suspend/resume callbacks from struct
> > >> bus_type eventually, as that's long overdue, and this is needed for
> > >> that purpose.  Not too urgent, though.
> > >
> > > Sorry, I'd forgotten that I already had a similar patch:
> > >
> > > http://git.armlinux.org.uk/cgit/linux-arm.git/commit/?h=sa1100&id=0e4ec3edb1c7e44aba1f48b924ab0c77431fd155
> > >
> > > so no need to merge your veresion... I just need to get my version merged.
> > 
> > OK
> 
> As other maintainers have taken patches from my series, I can no longer
> merge your patch this cycle, (due to the dependencies involving multiple
> trees.)  I'll postpone the change until after the next merge window.

That's OK, thanks.

> I can't really say about Locomo, having never really been involved with
> that stuff.

Well, so far no on has been complaining about that patch. :-)

Thanks,
Rafael