From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754762AbaE1QFM (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 28 May 2014 12:05:12 -0400
Received: from sabe.cs.wisc.edu ([128.105.6.20]:48881 "EHLO sabe.cs.wisc.edu"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753144AbaE1QFK (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 28 May 2014 12:05:10 -0400
Message-ID: <5386090F.9060004@cs.wisc.edu>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 11:04:31 -0500
From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130917 Thunderbird/17.0.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
CC: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Vikas Chaudhary <vikas.chaudhary@qlogic.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree
References: <20140519140614.GA12183@infradead.org> <20140520100343.31490551@canb.auug.org.au> <20140520053928.GA1751@infradead.org> <20140521094636.515289e8@canb.auug.org.au> <1400639101.2481.19.camel@dabdike> <20140528105429.GA20549@infradead.org> <538602BB.2080609@cs.wisc.edu> <20140528155008.GA6913@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140528155008.GA6913@infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 05/28/2014 10:50 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:37:31AM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
>> On 05/28/2014 05:54 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>       be2iscsi: Fix processing cqe for cxn whose endpoint is freed
>>
>> I didn't look at your tree, but when this patch was posted on the list I
>> think it had a bug.
>>
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg74191.html
> 
> I read through it and saw your comment, but so far it seems the patch
> and especially the series does more good than harm.

Did you see these patchsets:

[PATCH 00/10] qla4xxx: 5.04.00-k5: Updates for scsi "misc" branch
and
[PATCH 0/6] qla4xxx: 5.04.00-k6: Updates for scsi "misc" branch

? I think they should be ok for your tree if you did not see any issues
with them.