From: Matthias May <matthias.may@westermo.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] usbnet: limit max_mtu based on device's hard_mtu
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 09:21:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <539202f5-43ba-4938-a9b2-393c1bb3e072@westermo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260119075518.2774373-1-lvivier@redhat.com>
On 19/01/2026 8:55 am, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> The usbnet driver initializes net->max_mtu to ETH_MAX_MTU before calling
> the device's bind() callback. When the bind() callback sets
> dev->hard_mtu based the device's actual capability (from CDC Ethernet's
> wMaxSegmentSize descriptor), max_mtu is never updated to reflect this
> hardware limitation).
>
> This allows userspace (DHCP or IPv6 RA) to configure MTU larger than the
> device can handle, leading to silent packet drops when the backend sends
> packet exceeding the device's buffer size.
>
> Fix this by limiting net->max_mtu to the device's hard_mtu after the
> bind callback returns.
>
> See https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/3268__;!!I9LPvj3b!H-nIZIscCCh_2FnbJInagPxXTe0XcNu58-8k3NqGYKRdDy8LBOBjWiTIc1E-cC2wnv91MtZrak2pu7K-4cU$ and
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugs.passt.top/attachment.cgi?bugid=189__;!!I9LPvj3b!H-nIZIscCCh_2FnbJInagPxXTe0XcNu58-8k3NqGYKRdDy8LBOBjWiTIc1E-cC2wnv91MtZrak2pq4lrvZI$
>
> Fixes: f77f0aee4da4 ("net: use core MTU range checking in USB NIC drivers")
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
> Link: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugs.passt.top/show_bug.cgi?id=189__;!!I9LPvj3b!H-nIZIscCCh_2FnbJInagPxXTe0XcNu58-8k3NqGYKRdDy8LBOBjWiTIc1E-cC2wnv91MtZrak2p8csXaww$
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c b/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c
> index 36742e64cff7..1093c2a412d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c
> @@ -1821,9 +1821,12 @@ usbnet_probe(struct usb_interface *udev, const struct usb_device_id *prod)
> if ((dev->driver_info->flags & FLAG_NOARP) != 0)
> net->flags |= IFF_NOARP;
>
> - /* maybe the remote can't receive an Ethernet MTU */
> - if (net->mtu > (dev->hard_mtu - net->hard_header_len))
> - net->mtu = dev->hard_mtu - net->hard_header_len;
> + if (net->max_mtu > (dev->hard_mtu - net->hard_header_len))
> + net->max_mtu = dev->hard_mtu - net->hard_header_len;
> +
> + if (net->mtu > net->max_mtu)
> + net->mtu = net->max_mtu;
> +
> } else if (!info->in || !info->out)
> status = usbnet_get_endpoints(dev, udev);
> else {
Hi Laurent
This change was backported to 6.6.* and caused a regression with wwan
devices via USB when using a mux.
Tested on a Quectel EM12 running the firmware
EM12GPAR01A21M4G_01.300.01.300.
Tue May 5 09:49:35.638 2026 kern.info kernel: [ 10.819620] qmi_wwan
1-1.2:1.4: cdc-wdm0: USB WDM device
Tue May 5 09:49:35.638 2026 kern.info kernel: [ 10.829601] qmi_wwan
1-1.2:1.4 cellular0: register 'qmi_wwan' at usb-fsl-ehci.0-1.2, WWAN/QMI
device, 6a:c3:49:88:47:b1
Tue May 5 09:49:35.638 2026 kern.info kernel: [ 10.840579] usbcore:
registered new interface driver qmi_wwan
The parent interface (we renamed it "cellular0") requires an MTU of 1504
(4 bytes overhead from the muxer).
The actual wwan0, wwan1 interfaces have an MTU of 1500.
With this change it's no longer possible to set an MTU of 1504 on cellular0.
BR
Matthias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-18 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-19 7:55 Laurent Vivier
2026-01-21 3:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-05-18 7:21 ` Matthias May [this message]
2026-05-18 7:36 ` Laurent Vivier
2026-05-18 11:26 ` Matthias May
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=539202f5-43ba-4938-a9b2-393c1bb3e072@westermo.com \
--to=matthias.may@westermo.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®