From: "Yang,Wei" <Wei.Yang@windriver.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: <balbi@ti.com>, <mina86@mina86.com>, <andrzej.p@samsung.com>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] USB:gadget: Fix a warning while loading g_mass_storage
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 14:02:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53954DDE.5070407@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1406051403211.1103-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Hi Alan,
Sorry for my late response, as I was 000, Additionally, I am very
grateful for your review.
On 06/06/2014 02:08 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 Wei.Yang@windriver.com wrote:
>
>> From: Yang Wei <Wei.Yang@windriver.com>
>>
>> While loading g_mass_storage module, the following warning is triggered.
>>
>> WARNING: at drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c:
>> usb_composite_setup_continue: Unexpected call
>> Modules linked in: fat vfat minix nls_cp437 nls_iso8859_1 g_mass_storage
>> [<800179cc>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x104) from [<80619608>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24)
>> [<80619608>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24) from [<80025100>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x64/0x74)
>> [<80025100>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x64/0x74) from [<800251cc>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x48)
>> [<800251cc>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x48) from [<7f047774>] (usb_composite_setup_continue+0xb4/0xbc [g_mass_storage])
>> [<7f047774>] (usb_composite_setup_continue+0xb4/0xbc [g_mass_storage]) from [<7f047ad4>] (handle_exception+0x358/0x3e4 [g_mass_storage])
>> [<7f047ad4>] (handle_exception+0x358/0x3e4 [g_mass_storage]) from [<7f048080>] (fsg_main_thread+0x520/0x157c [g_mass_storage])
>> [<7f048080>] (fsg_main_thread+0x520/0x157c [g_mass_storage]) from [<8004bc90>] (kthread+0x98/0x9c)
>> [<8004bc90>] (kthread+0x98/0x9c) from [<8000faec>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)
>>
>> The root cause is that Robert once introduced the following patch to fix
>> disconnect handling of s3c-hsotg.
>> [
>> commit d18f7116a5ddb8263fe62b05ad63e5ceb5875791
>> Author: Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@samsung.com>
>> Date: Thu Nov 21 13:49:18 2013 +0100
>>
>> usb: gadget: s3c-hsotg: fix disconnect handling
>>
>> This patch moves s3c_hsotg_disconnect function call from USBSusp interrupt
>> handler to SET_ADDRESS request handler.
>>
>> It's because disconnected state can't be detected directly, because this
>> hardware doesn't support Disconnected interrupt for device mode. For both
>> Suspend and Disconnect events there is one interrupt USBSusp, but calling
>> s3c_hsotg_disconnect from this interrupt handler causes config reset in
>> composite layer, which is not undesirable for Suspended state.
>>
>> For this reason s3c_hsotg_disconnect is called from SET_ADDRESS request
>> handler, which occurs always after disconnection, so we do disconnect
>> immediately before we are connected again. It's probably only way we
>> can do handle disconnection correctly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
>> ]
>>
>> So it also means that s3c_hsotg_disconnect is called from SET_ADDRESS request handler,
>> ultimately reset_config would finally be called, it raises a FSG_STATE_CONFIG_CHANGE exception,
>> and set common->new_fsg to NULL, and then wakes up fsg_main_thread to handle this exception.
>> After handling SET_ADDRESS, subsequently the irq hanler of s3c-hsotg would also invokes composite_setup()
>> function to handle USB_REQ_SET_CONFIGURATION request, set_config would be invoked, it
>> not only raises a FSG_STATE_CONFIG_CHANGE and set common->new_fsg to new_fsg but also makes
>> cdev->delayed_status plus one. If the execution ordering just likes the following scenario, the warning
>> would be triggered.
>>
>> irq handler
>> |
>> |-> s3c_hsotg_disconnect()
>> |
>> |-> common->new_fsg = NULL
>> |-> common->state = FSG_STATE_CONFIG
>> |-> wakes up fsg_main_thread.
>> |->set USB device address.
>>
>> fsg_main_thread
>> |
>> |-> handle_exception
>> |
>> |-> common->state = FSG_STATE_IDLE
>> |-> do_set_interface()
>> irq happens -------------->
>>
>> irq handler needs to handle USB_REQ_SET_CONFIGURATION request
>> |
>> |-> set_config()
>> |
>> |-> common->new_fsg = new_fsg;
>> |-> common->state = FSG_STATE_CONFIG
>> |-> cdev->delayed_status++
>> |-> wakes up fsg_main_thread
>>
>> fsg_main_thread
>> |
>> |-> Now the common->state = FSG_STATE_CONFIG and common->new_fsg is not equal to NULL
>> |-> if(common->new_fsg)
>> |-> usb_composite_setup_continue()
>> |-> cdev->delayed_status--
>> |-> fsg_main_thread still finds the common->state is equal to FSG_STATE_IDLE
>> |-> so it invokes handle_exception again, subsequently the usb_composite_setup_continue
>> |-> is executed again. It would fininally results in the warning.
>>
>> So we also need to define a variable(struct fsg_dev *new) and then save common->new_fsg
>> to it with the common->lock protection.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Wei <Wei.Yang@windriver.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/gadget/f_mass_storage.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>>
>> Only rephrase the commit log to make sense this issue.
>>
>> Wei
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/f_mass_storage.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/f_mass_storage.c
>> index b963939..e3b1798 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/f_mass_storage.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/f_mass_storage.c
>> @@ -2342,6 +2342,7 @@ static void handle_exception(struct fsg_common *common)
>> struct fsg_buffhd *bh;
>> enum fsg_state old_state;
>> struct fsg_lun *curlun;
>> + struct fsg_dev *new;
> The spacing is different from the lines above. There should be two tab
> characters between the 'v' and the '*', not three spaces.
>
> Also, the variable should be named "new_fsg", not "new".
Okay, I would fix it in v3.
>
>> unsigned int exception_req_tag;
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -2421,6 +2422,7 @@ static void handle_exception(struct fsg_common *common)
>> }
>> common->state = FSG_STATE_IDLE;
>> }
>> + new = common->new_fsg;
>> spin_unlock_irq(&common->lock);
>>
>> /* Carry out any extra actions required for the exception */
>> @@ -2460,8 +2462,8 @@ static void handle_exception(struct fsg_common *common)
>> break;
>>
>> case FSG_STATE_CONFIG_CHANGE:
>> - do_set_interface(common, common->new_fsg);
>> - if (common->new_fsg)
>> + do_set_interface(common, new);
>> + if (new)
>> usb_composite_setup_continue(common->cdev);
>> break;
> The description is long-winded and confusing, but the patch is correct.
> The existing code fails to take into account the possibility that
> common->new_fsg can change while do_set_interface() is running, because
> the spinlock isn't held at this point.
Yes, I used a long description to want to point out that the
common->new_fsg can be changed while do_set_interface is running. I would
use the above your description instead of mine in v3.
Thanks
Wei
>
> Alan Stern
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-09 6:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-03 9:37 [PATCH v1] " Wei.Yang
2014-06-03 14:48 ` Alan Stern
2014-06-04 1:20 ` Yang,Wei
2014-06-04 1:45 ` Peter Chen
2014-06-04 3:16 ` Yang,Wei
2014-06-04 4:41 ` Peter Chen
2014-06-04 13:56 ` Alan Stern
2014-06-04 18:48 ` Paul Zimmerman
2014-06-05 1:30 ` Peter Chen
2014-06-05 14:21 ` Alan Stern
2014-06-04 2:34 ` Yang,Wei
2014-06-04 12:06 ` Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2014-06-04 15:26 ` Alan Stern
2014-06-05 10:00 ` Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2014-06-05 18:10 ` Alan Stern
2014-06-04 4:32 ` [PATCH v2] " Wei.Yang
2014-06-05 18:08 ` Alan Stern
2014-06-09 6:02 ` Yang,Wei [this message]
2014-06-09 6:19 ` [PATCH v3] " Wei.Yang
2014-06-13 6:22 ` Yang,Wei
2014-06-13 13:39 ` Alan Stern
2014-06-14 13:10 ` Yang,Wei
2014-06-13 9:44 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-13 13:43 ` Alan Stern
2014-06-13 14:57 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-15 2:40 ` [PATCH] " Wei.Yang
2014-06-15 2:42 ` Yang,Wei
2014-06-17 5:59 ` Yang,Wei
2014-06-17 14:18 ` Alan Stern
2014-06-18 1:08 ` Yang,Wei
2014-06-18 11:44 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-18 14:22 ` Alan Stern
2014-06-19 1:48 ` Yang,Wei
2014-06-17 18:20 ` Michal Nazarewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53954DDE.5070407@windriver.com \
--to=wei.yang@windriver.com \
--cc=andrzej.p@samsung.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome