From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG][RFC] Miscalculated inflight counter in io_uring
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:32:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <539958bc-7010-c6dc-7647-b6632b37569c@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bfecc5ba-274b-b2f7-52dc-8ac6e0fab352@gmail.com>
On 10/25/19 3:48 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> In case of IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL | IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL:
>
> @inflight count returned by io_submit_sqes() is the number of entries
> picked up from a sqring including already completed/failed. And
> completed but not failed requests will be placed into @poll_list.
>
> Then io_sq_thread() tries to poll @inflight events, even though failed
> won't appear in @poll_list. Thus, it will think that there are always
> something to poll (i.e. @inflight > 0)
>
> There are several issues with this:
> 1. io_sq_thread won't ever sleep
> 2. io_sq_thread() may be left running and actively polling even after
> user process is destroyed
> 3. the same goes for mm_struct with all vmas of the user process
> TL;DR;
> awhile @inflight > 0, io_sq_thread won't put @cur_mm, so locking
> recycling of vmas used for rings' mapping, which hold refcount of
> io_uring's struct file. Thus, io_uring_release() won't be called, as
> well as kthread_{park,stop}(). That's all in case when the user process
> haven't unmapped rings.
>
>
> I'm not sure how to fix it better:
> 1. try to put failed into poll_list (grabbing mutex).
>
> 2. test for zero-inflight case with comparing sq and cq. something like
> ```
> if (nr_polled == 0) {
> lock(comp_lock);
> if (cached_cq_head == cached_sq_tail)
> inflight = 0;
> unlock(comp_lock);
> }
> ```
> But that's adds extra spinlock locking in fast-path. And that's unsafe
> to use non-cached heads/tails, as it could be maliciously changed by
> userspace.
>
> 3. Do some counting of failed (probably needs atomic or synchronisation)
>
> 4. something else?
Can we just look at the completion count? Ala:
prev_tail = ctx->cached_cq_tail;
inflight += io_submit_sqes(ctx, to_submit, cur_mm != NULL,
mm_fault);
if (prev_tail != ctx->cached_cq_tail)
inflight -= (ctx->cached_cq_tail - prev_tail);
or something like that.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-25 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-25 9:48 Pavel Begunkov
2019-10-25 15:32 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2019-10-25 16:08 ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-10-25 16:18 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=539958bc-7010-c6dc-7647-b6632b37569c@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®