From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752048AbaFPKwk (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2014 06:52:40 -0400 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:9776 "EHLO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751160AbaFPKwi (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2014 06:52:38 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,486,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="143685812" Message-ID: <539ECC71.7080008@citrix.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:52:33 +0100 From: David Vrabel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Kiper , , , , CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 2/7] efi: Introduce EFI_NO_DIRECT flag References: <1402678823-24589-1-git-send-email-daniel.kiper@oracle.com> <1402678823-24589-3-git-send-email-daniel.kiper@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <1402678823-24589-3-git-send-email-daniel.kiper@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.80.2.76] X-DLP: MIA2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13/06/14 18:00, Daniel Kiper wrote: > Introduce EFI_NO_DIRECT flag. EFI_PARAVIRT would be a clearer name I think. > +#define EFI_NO_DIRECT 6 /* Can we access EFI directly? */ #define EFI_PARAVIRT 6 /* Access is via a paravirt interface */ David