From: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
"Sun, Ning" <ning.sun@intel.com>,
"Dwarakanath, Kumar N" <kumar.n.dwarakanath@intel.com>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/8] crypto: x86/aes-kl - Support AES algorithm using Key Locker instructions
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 20:48:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53AC005F-DA02-4648-9CA9-64C9A1E6C9BA@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrWbuf6jJU_wfKwuCL97SZhXd9Vqfd8RhdO1uwLZKMM=Fw@mail.gmail.com>
First of all, my apologies for the delay. I wish now with v2 [1] is a
momentum.
On Dec 17, 2020, at 12:54, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> What does this patch *do*?
It adds a new AES implementation that can be a replacement for the AES-NI
version.
> IKL gives a few special key slots that have certain restrictions and
> certain security properties.
I think this can be viewed as one implementation of Envelope Encryption.
Internal Wrapping Key (IWKey) on the spec is practically Key-Encryption Key.
Each CPU has one key state and it is used to encode AES keys (or Data
Encryption Key) as many as a user wants. An encoded form may convey access
restrictions.
> What can you use them for? With this series installed, what is the
> user-visible effect? Is there a new API? Do you use them with the netlink
> user crypto interface? Do you use them for encrypting disks? Swap?
No new API is added here.
No observable effect is expected to end-users. AES Key Locker provides the
same function of transforming data and does this for the chaining modes at the
same speed (or a bit faster).
As a replacement for AES-NI, the usage will be pretty much the same as
AES-NI’s. Admittedly, this instruction set has some limitations, e.g., with no
192-bit key support.
Since it can protect AES keys during the transformation, I think one may
consider using it for huge data. So, yes, block disk encryption for instance.
For testing purposes though, I was able to run it with dm-crypt [2].
> How? How do you allocate, reset, and free keys? Who has permissions to use
> them?
IWKey (or KEK) is loaded only in kernel mode. The value is randomized.
FWIW, the code intentionally sets a restriction to the encoded form. Once
encoded from an AES key, AES instructions that referencing it have to be
executed in kernel mode.
Thanks,
Chang
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210514201508.27967-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com/
[2] https://gitlab.com/cryptsetup/cryptsetup/-/wikis/DMCrypt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-14 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-16 17:41 [RFC PATCH 0/8] x86: Support Intel Key Locker Chang S. Bae
2020-12-16 17:41 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] x86/cpufeature: Enumerate Key Locker feature Chang S. Bae
2020-12-16 17:41 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] x86/cpu: Load Key Locker internal key at boot-time Chang S. Bae
2020-12-16 17:41 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] x86/msr-index: Add MSRs for Key Locker internal key Chang S. Bae
2020-12-16 17:41 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] x86/power: Restore Key Locker internal key from the ACPI S3/4 sleep states Chang S. Bae
2020-12-17 19:10 ` Eric Biggers
2020-12-18 1:00 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-01-28 10:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-01-28 16:10 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2020-12-16 17:41 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] x86/cpu: Add a config option and a chicken bit for Key Locker Chang S. Bae
2020-12-16 17:41 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] selftests/x86: Test Key Locker internal key maintenance Chang S. Bae
2020-12-18 9:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-18 10:43 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2020-12-16 17:41 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] crypto: x86/aes-kl - Support AES algorithm using Key Locker instructions Chang S. Bae
2020-12-17 10:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-14 20:36 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2020-12-17 20:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-05-14 20:48 ` Bae, Chang Seok [this message]
2020-12-17 20:58 ` [NEEDS-REVIEW] " Dave Hansen
2020-12-18 9:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-18 10:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-18 10:34 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2020-12-18 11:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-18 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-16 17:41 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] x86/cpu: Support the hardware randomization option for Key Locker internal key Chang S. Bae
2020-12-17 19:10 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] x86: Support Intel Key Locker Eric Biggers
2020-12-17 20:07 ` Dan Williams
2020-12-18 1:08 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2020-12-19 18:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-22 19:03 ` Bae, Chang Seok
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53AC005F-DA02-4648-9CA9-64C9A1E6C9BA@intel.com \
--to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kumar.n.dwarakanath@intel.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ning.sun@intel.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®