Re: [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: stronger test in process_one_work()

[Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>]

Ping.

Thanks,
Lai

On 06/26/2014 07:27 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On 06/20/2014 03:44 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 03:33:28PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>>> When POOL_DISASSOCIATED is cleared, the running worker's local CPU should
>>> be the same as pool->cpu without any exception even during cpu-hotplug.
>>>
>>> This fix changes "(proposition_A && proposition_B && proposition_C)"
>>> to "(proposition_B && proposition_C)", so if the old compound proposition
>>> is true, the new one must be true too. so this fix will not hide any
>>> possible bug which can be hit by old test.
>>>
>>> CC: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> CC: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>
>> Applied to wq/for-3.17 with minor updates.
>>
>> Nice set of cleanups.  Thanks!
>>
> 
> Hi,Tejun
> 
> I found the slight earlier 6 patches are in wq/for-3.17.
> But these two patches (in this email thread) are not in wq/for-3.17 yet.
> 
> workqueue: clear POOL_DISASSOCIATED in rebind_workers()
> workqueue: stronger test in process_one_work()
> 
> Thanks,
> Lai
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>