From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754676AbaGPXiq (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2014 19:38:46 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:47056 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752818AbaGPXim (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2014 19:38:42 -0400 Message-ID: <53C70CCC.2080109@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:37:48 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hanjun Guo , "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: Catalin Marinas , Graeme Gregory , Tony Luck , Thomas Gleixner , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI: ARM64 does not have a BIOS add config for BIOS table scan. References: <1404898746-6685-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1404898746-6685-2-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <1404898746-6685-2-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/09/2014 02:39 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: > From: Graeme Gregory > > With the addition of ARM64 that does not have a traditional BIOS to > scan, add a config option which is selected on x86 and ia64 to do > the traditional BIOS scanning for tables. > > Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo > --- > arch/ia64/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + > drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 3 +++ > drivers/acpi/osl.c | 4 +++- > 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig > index 2f3abcf..c54bd7e 100644 > --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig > @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ config IA64 > select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA > select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF > select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL > + select ACPI_LEGACY_TABLES_LOOKUP if ACPI > default y > help > The Itanium Processor Family is Intel's 64-bit successor to This shouldn't actually be set on IA64, should it? IA64 doesn't have BIOS, either, it has EFI/UEFI, like ARM64... -hpa