From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753567AbaHEMFs (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2014 08:05:48 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:65121 "EHLO mail-pd0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751558AbaHEMFp (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2014 08:05:45 -0400 Message-ID: <53E0C839.3000808@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 17:34:09 +0530 From: Varka Bhadram Organization: CDAC-HYD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Matthias Brugger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jslaby@suse.cz, grant.likely@linaro.org, heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, asierra@xes-inc.com, mwelling@ieee.org, dianders@chromium.org, m-karicheri2@ti.com, jschultz@xes-inc.com, mingo@elte.hu, balbi@ti.com, heiko@sntech.de, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] tty: serial: 8250: Add Mediatek UART driver References: <1407236054-30994-1-git-send-email-matthias.bgg@gmail.com> <1407236054-30994-3-git-send-email-matthias.bgg@gmail.com> <53E0C633.7060600@gmail.com> <1407240147.30675.29.camel@acox1-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1407240147.30675.29.camel@acox1-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/05/2014 05:32 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 17:25 +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote: >> On 08/05/2014 04:24 PM, Matthias Brugger wrote: >> >> (...) >> >>> +#include >>> +#include >>> +#include >>> +#include >>> +#include >>> +#include >>> +#include >>> +#include >>> +#include "8250.h" >>> + >> Better if we have includes in alphabetical order.. > > So 8250.h would be first and it wouldn't compile ??? > > Can we stick to serious critiques ? The local headers should be at the end of all includes..? -- Regards, Varka Bhadram.