From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751986AbaHTKgV (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2014 06:36:21 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([93.93.135.160]:43009 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750939AbaHTKgT (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2014 06:36:19 -0400 Message-ID: <53F47A1B.2030204@collabora.co.uk> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:36:11 +0200 From: Javier Martinez Canillas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= CC: Kukjin Kim , Doug Anderson , Olof Johansson , Mark Brown , Naveen Krishna Chatradhi , Rahul Sharma , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: dts: Add vmmc and vqmmc supplies for Peach Pit and Pi boards References: <1408460913-13863-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1408460913-13863-6-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <53F39978.3080901@suse.de> <53F476C6.9030809@collabora.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <53F476C6.9030809@collabora.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Andreas, On 08/20/2014 12:21 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Andreas, > > Thanks a lot for your feedback. > > On 08/19/2014 08:37 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> &mmc_2 { >>> + vmmc-supply = <&tps65090_fet4>; >>> + vqmmc-supply = <&vqmmc_sdcard>; >>> status = "okay"; >>> num-slots = <1>; >>> supports-highspeed; >> >> A convention that I picked up was to place overridden status property >> first. Do your new properties really need to go before that? >> > > OF doesn't care about the order of the child nodes but I do agree that > consistency is a good thing so I'll change that on v2. > Actually I meant that I'll change this for a future re-post since I'm completely dropping this patch from the series due Doug's explanation about the CD line and VCCQ/VDD_IO being in the same power rail on Exynos5 SoCs. Sorry for the noise... Best regards, Javier