mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Zhong <zyw@rock-chips.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Pawel Moll" <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Ian Campbell" <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	"Kumar Gala" <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	"Samuel Ortiz" <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"Alessandro Zummo" <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	"Mike Turquette" <mturquette@linaro.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
	"Grant Likely" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	"Lin Huang" <hl@rock-chips.com>,
	"Tao Huang" <huangtao@rock-chips.com>,
	"Eddie Cai" <cf@rock-chips.com>,
	zhangqing <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>, xxx <xxx@rock-chips.com>,
	"Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Olof Johansson" <olof@lixom.net>,
	"Sonny Rao" <sonnyrao@chromium.org>,
	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dtor@chromium.org>,
	"Javier Martinez Canillas" <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>,
	"Kever Yang" <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] RTC: RK808: add RTC driver for RK808
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:47:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FC579C.50507@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=VYJvgXXcYkq+vcpZkXZBDbgfRGNyF8GA6MnvMAGaAebQ@mail.gmail.com>


On 08/26/2014 11:22 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> +       int ret;
>> >+
>> >+       /* Has the RTC been programmed? */
>> >+       ret = regmap_update_bits(rk808->regmap, RK808_RTC_CTRL_REG,
>> >+                                BIT_RTC_CTRL_REG_RTC_V_OPT_M, 0);
> Can you explain what you're doing here?  The comment seems wrong since
> it implies that you're checking something.
>
> >From what I can tell from the manual you're setting "RTC_READSEL" to 0
> which means "Read access directly to dynamic registers.".  That's not
> clear here, and RTC_V_OPT_M makes no sense to me.

RK808 has a shadowed register for saving a "frozen" RTC time.
When user setting "RTC_READSEL" to 1, the time will save in this 
shadowed register.
In this case, user read rtc time register, actually get the time of that 
moment.
So, I move it to probe, this bit needn't clear every time
>> >+       tm->tm_min = bcd2bin(rtc_data[1]) & MINUTES_REG_MAK;
>> >+       tm->tm_hour = bcd2bin(rtc_data[2]) & HOURS_REG_MSK;
>> >+       tm->tm_mday = bcd2bin(rtc_data[3]) & DAYS_REG_MSK;
>> >+       tm->tm_mon = (bcd2bin(rtc_data[4]) & MONTHS_REG_MSK) - 1;
>> >+       tm->tm_year = (bcd2bin(rtc_data[5]) & YEARS_REG_MSK) + 100;
>> >+       tm->tm_wday = bcd2bin(rtc_data[6]) & WEEKS_REG_MSK;
>> >+       dev_dbg(dev, "RTC date/time %4d-%02d-%02d(%d) %02d:%02d:%02d\n",
>> >+               1900 + tm->tm_year, tm->tm_mon + 1, tm->tm_mday,
>> >+               tm->tm_wday, tm->tm_hour , tm->tm_min, tm->tm_sec);
>> >+
>> >+       return 0;
>> >+}
>> >+
>> >+/*
>> >+ * Set current time and date in RTC
>> >+ */
>> >+static int rk808_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> Make this "const struct rtc_time *tm"
It will be a warning if add const.
It should be match
int (*set_time)(struct device *, struct rtc_time *);
in rtc.h
>
>> +               rk808_rtc_set_time(&pdev->dev, &tm_def);
>> >+       }
>> >+
>> >+       device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 1);
> You can skip this.  We'll set "wakeup-source" in the device tree.
> That will set I2C_CLIENT_WAKE.  That will cause the i2c core to call
> device_init_wakeup() for you.
If I remove it, wakealarm is disappear, even though I add 
"wakeup-source" in device tree.
So, I keep it temporarily
>
>> +       if (IS_ERR(rk808_rtc->rtc)) {
>> >+               ret = PTR_ERR(rk808_rtc->rtc);
>> >+               return ret;
>> >+       }
>> >+
>> >+       alm_irq  = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> Are you sure that platform_get_irq() works in this case?  In Javier's
> in-flight max77802 driver he use regmap_irq_get_virq().
>
> ...oh, maybe your way does work!  You've got the rtc_resources to
> specify things, so that looks good...
>
> ...but I tried testing it by doing:
>
> cd /sys/class/rtc/rtc0
> echo +2 > wakealarm
> sleep 5
> grep 808 /proc/interrupts
>
> ...and I didn't see an interrupt go off.  Any idea why?
It works well.






  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-26  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-25 13:34 Chris Zhong
2014-08-26  3:22 ` Doug Anderson
2014-08-26  9:47   ` Chris Zhong [this message]
2014-08-26 18:24     ` Doug Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53FC579C.50507@rock-chips.com \
    --to=zyw@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cf@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=dtor@chromium.org \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=hl@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=huangtao@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk \
    --cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sonnyrao@chromium.org \
    --cc=xxx@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=zhangqing@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®