From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>
To: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace/osnoise: Fix possible recursive locking in stop_per_cpu_kthreads
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 09:42:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53ba30f1-c867-f34e-b262-08df67ef26fb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220919144932.3064014-1-npache@redhat.com>
Hi Nico!
On 9/19/22 16:49, Nico Pache wrote:
> There is a recursive lock on the cpu_hotplug_lock.
>
> In kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c:<start/stop>_per_cpu_kthreads:
> - start_per_cpu_kthreads calls cpus_read_lock() and if
> start_kthreads returns a error it will call stop_per_cpu_kthreads.
> - stop_per_cpu_kthreads then calls cpus_read_lock() again causing
> deadlock.
Yep, I see the problem.
> Fix this by calling cpus_read_unlock() before calling
> stop_per_cpu_kthreads. This behavior can also be seen in commit
> f46b16520a08 ("trace/hwlat: Implement the per-cpu mode").
Correct, we have a similar function that *without* this problem.
> This error was noticed during the LTP ftrace-stress-test:
>
> WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
> --------------------------------------------
> sh/275006 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffffffffb02f5400 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: stop_per_cpu_kthreads
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffffffffb02f5400 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: start_per_cpu_kthreads
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0
> ----
> lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
> lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> May be due to missing lock nesting notation
>
> 3 locks held by sh/275006:
> #0: ffff8881023f0470 (sb_writers#24){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write
> #1: ffffffffb084f430 (trace_types_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rb_simple_write
> #2: ffffffffb02f5400 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: start_per_cpu_kthreads
>
> Fixes: c8895e271f79 ("trace/osnoise: Support hotplug operations")
> Signed-off-by: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>
Thanks!
-- Daniel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-20 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-19 14:49 Nico Pache
2022-09-20 7:42 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53ba30f1-c867-f34e-b262-08df67ef26fb@kernel.org \
--to=bristot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®