From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751332AbdBWOYd (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:24:33 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:43909 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751041AbdBWOYb (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:24:31 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/18] drivers/fsi: Add empty fsi bus definitions To: Geert Uytterhoeven , Christopher Bostic References: <20170201165358.45415-1-cbostic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170201165358.45415-2-cbostic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Greg KH , Michael Turquette , Geert Uytterhoeven , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , joel@jms.id.au, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , andrew@aj.id.au, Alistair Popple , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Chris Bostic From: Jeremy Kerr Message-ID: <53c63405-8aeb-9751-62d6-4583847dce3c@ozlabs.org> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:24:10 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Geert, >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/fsi/Kconfig >> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ >> +# >> +# FSI subsystem >> +# >> + >> +menu "FSI support" >> + >> +config FSI >> + tristate "FSI support" > > I guess this should depend on some POWER symbol || COMPILE_TEST? No, this is pretty hardware-independent - all it requires on the HW side is two GPIOs. Although the FSI slave devices are typically only present on POWER systems, they can be driven from anything, with currently implementations being on ARM and 32-bit powerpc. Cheers, Jeremy