From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FF5630BF72 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 13:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771507535; cv=none; b=VINqQDp30ZRuhpBybCAh7Uxnyef149P3U8wpZmGg+aojKlpoVenk35VcqNDjlf8YOVAxiIv/8+emZGcrpcAebobK9aOu/8BubOxjkzV2RVGXWNZa+U2oDHVnrpy6OLj9NdmTPrnr5NdsOabdDor0OjTu/Nky8vcch3GrHywK/WU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771507535; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zAITM7ARHF+WE7vWOt37TrJ62UwFSLXGectaW9HY7eg=; h=From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=KEOgYoAGPkGj0pHl0c4yDJKi+VLiUse1v8xPFsgy2kB3sYtJH2sxfBzBFF861a+cr1SMZNCsc/CteqwwxwbSTpfeWLDU0D196XCbXnDBNxMdD7RsleyBkk7wySd/RQCzpQt5I2w3bjmJRbSqfmUWuJFhihdz+pVo+Ltxq3NhVbs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=bWtw/73D; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=dyCQdO9L; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="bWtw/73D"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="dyCQdO9L" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1771507533; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LLZn0gW0sZ3KEQOl+dn4/IbaOt96cTs7UR3OeikOvPE=; b=bWtw/73DOuDkHcHf7FrjDHezTzDD5hjuh62nYns0DjTZsPFlHOWjcvi8yZ/E/sOihvA+YH QOnRu8TjtG+KwjdUSD9STwPTDZ8BbQSPCYUtPUc/YLHVWZYL7Q+Pezx/6BVWgqtN7yrAAG 7nA+qu7fk9s4p8BBcHOzsKt1MFcRu8w= Received: from mail-qk1-f198.google.com (mail-qk1-f198.google.com [209.85.222.198]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-313-kH1AAO78N9CoFOr9Q76OLQ-1; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 08:25:32 -0500 X-MC-Unique: kH1AAO78N9CoFOr9Q76OLQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: kH1AAO78N9CoFOr9Q76OLQ_1771507532 Received: by mail-qk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-8cb0595def4so907789485a.0 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 05:25:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1771507532; x=1772112332; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:references :cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LLZn0gW0sZ3KEQOl+dn4/IbaOt96cTs7UR3OeikOvPE=; b=dyCQdO9LplXkVLGX+35fbgUH+1fxjsvQmaZVKyRfpX66honPoNDGm13CFpFXgB/p1B n4DzXt+lpeH5nGbyYPq4C+XGjZ0UjjEIeZiYC6INM+15K2c/TAhoO+msDMfaDqzdWI9Q KO97rBTBTh10tJ2/vsRBhOpFBr2DfH6iMoGokpDdSHP8XO05qULLw3UlfyrGiM+EAb5z npK4wTjKs/IKTnUnhaY7LpZRe5NkMGdrbwLhwx10BElD5RyMAuvmcFSqE7DI+MeZ4NwG xkALpCHI7gDKsWL9DZdbwqNaW4wXAXWIPupldr5a5kcouF92EdnbzgyiUwyCVTMr76L9 b+Ew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1771507532; x=1772112332; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:references :cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LLZn0gW0sZ3KEQOl+dn4/IbaOt96cTs7UR3OeikOvPE=; b=vrv0E2TPIXQtREf/Ysk3zsFhJpnGacUAEFrdCcY/NHs0XpIYG8ZFJpJbruUOa8rkWB /xP97RCsXlLyAyD/sis/c+v67+gLbo9fUQeBh3rHpITzagrv3lCcvBfT/nKGrg/tNpJ3 5LCvGbo9dt12eB6puLkf03w/9bxkFG4tED/cKtKVMpTfyz+CZmu8YIWgEGKMXUiw2M+Z moeHdMAfeLd7G9FnDnbMEIEOjHGQ9R4GEkuJLMVm2DqQi+1Dt0uK2ZNg2Z38dDnWgiMl dfEGLfUhqEEE/BhgN/EVu6cR2huWJzFBgAFSw+DOR2ZF30DxPVOSXaPpMWUu65xAxfDG pD2Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWiYSU11+552b2ymqS/Ou39MLzWvAFGKScVcfmqhyDKkHvp4LLjuuLM7XwVdONXJSEb4tcSbyXdTtOl+Os=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzwmJHJkQQtodSmouEDFijl5nY4irEhEKfWIEjPVCblOC1kG/ww F/0Y5qGesHO0jj68M45mJmVK4ZxxotjnopteDwre9tpy63TBbipB+kUL6JMUNo/H4eWma5Pn4s/ PyO6HjGNxUlvbELlF6qZiV+3gHvyJxEFfYIbqGLmsu9eeRwFZHnQQIxvtKHdiL4hKAA== X-Gm-Gg: AZuq6aLftcR5R1ZlzO5W2/iNFtfCpVumfiHnlOMoK3xeUj9YfBgp5ZSugoK92uKjsVo gh9pxTqdYiWrS+5G1iAXFdT0kgR8MYlS6cCm3fitRiANcDFWpOr51OLjMrlQi0Gi02CD2gp5Iac JcxJxfrnxIkkEd/i8xeCnUzbTb2plENGQkgmMmzUpV/vju04NoZFHNJTjrZ4/YJHW7rFn4W8RJJ zgwXUQeGhVHz12TjOJUCDMYV53FPZoiBHR36PwBbKAUMsgZXD8COwBdk51GAEd1vqWdjVStEZiT zFFdvFrhu9iZ2GRAOvQcs0wSkIqhOnsssdmCUzTvDpd1rbUGK4XGZMWlE5/X6jp+wrjoG4kLVu/ V7vWoepy9btdcVSm8fgOIewDsVyEZ9dmd6I5B3yhXsPWXPuPALfreBMDMuJXZAFBIDtYu X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2a0b:b0:8cb:1e3c:96fa with SMTP id af79cd13be357-8cb7be5dc30mr171241685a.11.1771507531643; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 05:25:31 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2a0b:b0:8cb:1e3c:96fa with SMTP id af79cd13be357-8cb7be5dc30mr171238485a.11.1771507531216; Thu, 19 Feb 2026 05:25:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2601:600:947f:f020:85dc:d2b2:c5ee:e3c4? ([2601:600:947f:f020:85dc:d2b2:c5ee:e3c4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-8cb4189da7asm1568727685a.37.2026.02.19.05.25.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Feb 2026 05:25:30 -0800 (PST) From: Waiman Long X-Google-Original-From: Waiman Long Message-ID: <53d73c5b-9445-43e1-9969-ec0a3920d47a@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 08:25:28 -0500 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] locking/mutex: Rename mutex_init_lockep() To: Davidlohr Bueso , peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de, boqun@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260217191512.1180151-1-dave@stgolabs.net> <20260217191512.1180151-2-dave@stgolabs.net> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20260217191512.1180151-2-dave@stgolabs.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2/17/26 2:15 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > Typo, this wants to be _lockdep(). > > Fixes: 51d7a054521d ("locking/mutex: Redo __mutex_init() to reduce generated code size") > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso > --- > include/linux/mutex.h | 4 ++-- > kernel/locking/mutex.c | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/mutex.h b/include/linux/mutex.h > index ecaa0440f6ec..8126da959088 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mutex.h > +++ b/include/linux/mutex.h > @@ -87,12 +87,12 @@ do { \ > struct mutex mutexname = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mutexname) > > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC > -void mutex_init_lockep(struct mutex *lock, const char *name, struct lock_class_key *key); > +void mutex_init_lockdep(struct mutex *lock, const char *name, struct lock_class_key *key); > > static inline void __mutex_init(struct mutex *lock, const char *name, > struct lock_class_key *key) > { > - mutex_init_lockep(lock, name, key); > + mutex_init_lockdep(lock, name, key); > } > #else > extern void mutex_init_generic(struct mutex *lock); > diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c > index 2a1d165b3167..c867f6c15530 100644 > --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c > +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c > @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static __always_inline bool __mutex_unlock_fast(struct mutex *lock) > > #else /* !CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */ > > -void mutex_init_lockep(struct mutex *lock, const char *name, struct lock_class_key *key) > +void mutex_init_lockdep(struct mutex *lock, const char *name, struct lock_class_key *key) > { > __mutex_init_generic(lock); > > @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ void mutex_init_lockep(struct mutex *lock, const char *name, struct lock_class_k > debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)lock, sizeof(*lock)); > lockdep_init_map_wait(&lock->dep_map, name, key, 0, LD_WAIT_SLEEP); > } > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_init_lockep); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_init_lockdep); > #endif /* !CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */ > > static inline void __mutex_set_flag(struct mutex *lock, unsigned long flag) Yes, this typo can be easy to miss. Acked-by: Waiman Long