From: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc: <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <johan@kernel.org>,
<konradybcio@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Skip adding bad duplicates
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 12:30:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53d929a2-2f54-ac97-3184-861442e8622b@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zth9EMydkwvJ30T0@pluto>
On 9/4/24 21:00, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 04:21:49PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 08:43:24AM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>>> Ensure that the bad duplicates reported by the platform firmware doesn't
>>> get added to the opp-tables.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Sibi,
>>
>> so if the idea is to make the code more robust when FW sends BAD
>> duplicates, you necessarily need to properly drop opps in opp_count too.
>>
>> One other option would be to just loop with xa_for_each BUT opp_count is
>> used in a number of places...so first of all let's try drop count properly.
>>
>> Can you try this patch down below, instead of your patch.
>> If it solves, I will send a patch (after testing it a bit more :D)
>
> Hold on... I sent you a diff that does not apply probably on your tree due
> to some uncomitted local work of mine...my bad...let me resend.
Hey Cristian,
Thanks for taking time to send out the diff. I thought this would be
enough but there will still be a disconnect between opp_count and idx
of the opp we populate. Consider a case were we get to have a valid
opp just after duplicate opp. The opp_count will still limit us on what
levels we are allowed to see.
-Sibi
>
> Thanks,
> Cristian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-07 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-04 3:13 [PATCH V2 0/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Misc Fixes Sibi Sankar
2024-09-04 3:13 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Ensure that the message-id supports fastchannel Sibi Sankar
2024-09-04 7:00 ` Johan Hovold
2024-09-04 11:29 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-04 12:38 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-09-04 14:20 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-09-05 12:54 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-10-07 6:46 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-09-04 3:13 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Skip adding bad duplicates Sibi Sankar
2024-09-04 7:09 ` Johan Hovold
2024-09-04 8:05 ` Johan Hovold
2024-09-04 13:56 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-04 14:00 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-04 15:21 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-09-04 15:30 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-09-04 15:46 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-09-05 12:43 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-10-07 7:00 ` Sibi Sankar [this message]
2024-10-09 14:20 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-09-04 16:12 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-09-04 16:20 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-10-07 6:51 ` Sibi Sankar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53d929a2-2f54-ac97-3184-861442e8622b@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_sibis@quicinc.com \
--cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®