From: Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com>
To: Stanley Jhu <stanleyjhu@google.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
Cc: Can Guo <can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] scsi: ufs: Fix device management timeouts and runtime PM errors
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 14:32:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53fe962918514149044cd919786ff12d56b8d33d.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029040003.2100003-1-stanleyjhu@google.com>
On Thu, 2026-10-29 at 15:08 +0800, Stanley Jhu wrote:
> This series fixes two problems in UFS core entry points that issue
> device management commands or touch host registers.
>
> Patch 1/5 restores the millisecond to jiffies conversion of device
> management command timeouts. Since the timeout moved to rq->timeout,
> a 1500 ms query timeout waits 6 s with CONFIG_HZ=250.
>
> Patches 2/5 to 5/5 handle runtime PM resume errors. Several UFS core,
> sysfs, BSG, hwmon, and debugfs entry points call
> ufshcd_rpm_get_sync()
> before accessing host registers or issuing device management and UIC
> commands, but ignore its return value.
>
> ufshcd_rpm_get_sync() wraps pm_runtime_get_sync() on the UFS device
> W-LUN and returns a negative errno when runtime resume of the W-LUN
> or
> host controller fails, leaving the device or controller in
> RPM_SUSPENDED.
>
> Continuing after such a failure can access host registers or issue
> commands while the device or controller is not known to be active,
> while checking pm_runtime_get_sync() directly would leave
> power.usage_count elevated unless balanced with
> pm_runtime_put_noidle().
>
> Add ufshcd_rpm_resume_and_get() around pm_runtime_resume_and_get()
> and
> convert the 20 external and helper call sites to abort and propagate
> the
> error when resuming the W-LUN fails. The three lifecycle call sites
> in
> ufshcd_rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work(), ufshcd_wl_shutdown(), and
> ufshcd_remove(), plus ufshcd_err_handling_prepare(), are
> intentionally
> left unchanged.
>
> Tested on QEMU ARM64 UFS (SDB and MCQ) with W-LUN runtime resume and
> suspend failures via sysfs offline (no behavior change on suspend
> failure) and GDB power.disable_depth=1 to make ufshcd_rpm_get_sync()
> fail, and on SDB with a timed out query request.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Drop the incorrect claim that a failed W-LUN runtime suspend
> latches power.runtime_error from the cover letter and commit
> messages. The PM core latches a runtime suspend error only if it
> is neither -EBUSY nor -EAGAIN, and in-tree UFS drivers fail W-LUN
> runtime suspend only with -EBUSY or -EAGAIN (Bart).
> - Say in the cover letter how the series was tested.
> - Describe each failing sequence in patches 2-5 step by step in
> time order, and drop the runtime PM disabled (-EACCES) scenario.
>
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20261025013446.345974-1-stanleyjhu@google.com/
>
>
> Stanley Jhu (5):
> scsi: ufs: core: Restore jiffies conversion of device management
> timeouts
> scsi: ufs: core: Introduce ufshcd_rpm_resume_and_get() helper
> scsi: ufs: sysfs: Propagate runtime PM resume errors
> scsi: ufs: bsg: Abort ufs_bsg_request() when runtime resume fails
> scsi: ufs: hwmon, debugfs: Propagate runtime PM resume errors
>
> drivers/ufs/core/ufs-debugfs.c | 8 +++-
> drivers/ufs/core/ufs-hwmon.c | 12 +++++-
> drivers/ufs/core/ufs-sysfs.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> --
> drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c | 4 +-
> drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h | 5 +++
> drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 9 +++--
> 6 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 503e6172fa74da6b4944ece458f5534681e51d21
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 7:08 Stanley Jhu
2026-10-29 7:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs: core: Restore jiffies conversion of device management timeouts Stanley Jhu
2026-10-29 7:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] scsi: ufs: core: Introduce ufshcd_rpm_resume_and_get() helper Stanley Jhu
2026-10-29 7:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] scsi: ufs: sysfs: Propagate runtime PM resume errors Stanley Jhu
2026-10-29 7:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] scsi: ufs: bsg: Abort ufs_bsg_request() when runtime resume fails Stanley Jhu
2026-10-29 7:08 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] scsi: ufs: hwmon, debugfs: Propagate runtime PM resume errors Stanley Jhu
2026-10-29 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] scsi: ufs: Fix device management timeouts and runtime PM errors Bart Van Assche
2026-10-30 6:32 ` Peter Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53fe962918514149044cd919786ff12d56b8d33d.camel@mediatek.com \
--to=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
--cc=stanleyjhu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®