From: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"Andreas Dilger" <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Minchan Kim" <minchan@kernel.org>,
"Joonsoo Kim" <js1304@gmail.com>, 이건호 <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/3] fs/buffer.c: allocate buffer cache with user specific flag
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:48:27 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5400061B.7060709@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140828105909.GE5961@quack.suse.cz>
2014-08-28 오후 7:59, Jan Kara 쓴 글:
> On Thu 28-08-14 11:31:46, Gioh Kim wrote:
>>
>> A buffer cache is allocated from movable area
>> because it is referred for a while and released soon.
>> But some filesystems are taking buffer cache for a long time
>> and it can disturb page migration.
>>
>> New APIs are introduced to allocate buffer cache
>> with user specific flag.
>> *_gfp APIs are for user want to set page allocation flag for page cache
>> allocation.
>> And *_unmovable APIs are for the user wants to allocate page cache from
>> non-movable area.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com>
> Still a few nits below.
>> ---
>> fs/buffer.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> include/linux/buffer_head.h | 14 ++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
>> index 8f05111..ee29bc4 100644
>> --- a/fs/buffer.c
>> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
>> @@ -993,7 +993,7 @@ init_page_buffers(struct page *page, struct block_device *bdev,
>> */
>> static int
>> grow_dev_page(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
>> - pgoff_t index, int size, int sizebits)
>> + pgoff_t index, int size, int sizebits, gfp_t gfp)
> I've noticed that whitespace got damaged in your patches (tabs replaced
> with spaces). Please use email client that doesn't do this or use
> attachments. Otherwise patch doesn't apply.
I'm sorry, it's my mistake.
I'm using Thunderbird but looking for another client.
>
>> {
>> struct inode *inode = bdev->bd_inode;
>> struct page *page;
>> @@ -1002,10 +1002,10 @@ grow_dev_page(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
>> int ret = 0; /* Will call free_more_memory() */
>> gfp_t gfp_mask;
>>
>> - gfp_mask = mapping_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping) & ~__GFP_FS;
>> - gfp_mask |= __GFP_MOVABLE;
>> + gfp_mask = (mapping_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping) & ~__GFP_FS) | gfp;
>> +
>> /*
>> - * XXX: __getblk_slow() can not really deal with failure and
>> + * XXX: __getblk_gfp() can not really deal with failure and
>> * will endlessly loop on improvised global reclaim. Prefer
>> * looping in the allocator rather than here, at least that
>> * code knows what it's doing.
>> @@ -1058,7 +1058,7 @@ failed:
>> * that page was dirty, the buffers are set dirty also.
>> */
>> static int
>> -grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
>> +grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size, gfp_t gfp)
>> {
>> pgoff_t index;
>> int sizebits;
>> @@ -1085,11 +1085,12 @@ grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
>> }
>>
>> /* Create a page with the proper size buffers.. */
>> - return grow_dev_page(bdev, block, index, size, sizebits);
>> + return grow_dev_page(bdev, block, index, size, sizebits, gfp);
>> }
>>
>> -static struct buffer_head *
>> -__getblk_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
>> +struct buffer_head *
>> +__getblk_gfp(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
>> + unsigned size, gfp_t gfp)
>> {
>> /* Size must be multiple of hard sectorsize */
>> if (unlikely(size & (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev)-1) ||
>> @@ -1111,13 +1112,21 @@ __getblk_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
>> if (bh)
>> return bh;
>>
>> - ret = grow_buffers(bdev, block, size);
>> + ret = grow_buffers(bdev, block, size, gfp);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> return NULL;
>> if (ret == 0)
>> free_more_memory();
>> }
>> }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__getblk_gfp);
>> +
>> +struct buffer_head *getblk_unmovable(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
>> + unsigned size)
>> +{
>> + return __getblk_gfp(bdev, block, size, 0);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(getblk_unmovable);
> This can be just an inline function in include/linux/buffer_head.h.
OK. I agreed.
>
>> /*
>> * The relationship between dirty buffers and dirty pages:
>> @@ -1385,7 +1394,7 @@ __getblk(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, unsigned size)
>>
>> might_sleep();
>> if (bh == NULL)
>> - bh = __getblk_slow(bdev, block, size);
>> + bh = __getblk_gfp(bdev, block, size, __GFP_MOVABLE);
>> return bh;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__getblk);
> I'd keep __getblk_slow() internal and just add 'gfp' parameter to it.
> Then change __getblk() to __getblk_gfp() and pass on the 'gfp' parameter.
> And finally define inline __getblk() in include/linux/buffer_head.h which
> just calls __getblk_gfp() with appropriate gfp mask.
>
> That way you keep all the interfaces completely symmetric. For example now
> you miss might_sleep() checks from __getblk_gfp().
>
> Honza
>
I got it.
What about below?: add gfp for __getblk_slow, change __getblk into __getblk_gfp,
getblk_unmovable and __getblk are, I think, symmetric.
If you say OK, I'm going to send v4 with tabs ;-)
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index 8f05111..21711c78 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -993,7 +993,7 @@ init_page_buffers(struct page *page, struct block_device *bdev,
*/
static int
grow_dev_page(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
- pgoff_t index, int size, int sizebits)
+ pgoff_t index, int size, int sizebits, gfp_t gfp)
{
struct inode *inode = bdev->bd_inode;
struct page *page;
@@ -1002,10 +1002,10 @@ grow_dev_page(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
int ret = 0; /* Will call free_more_memory() */
gfp_t gfp_mask;
- gfp_mask = mapping_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping) & ~__GFP_FS;
- gfp_mask |= __GFP_MOVABLE;
+ gfp_mask = (mapping_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping) & ~__GFP_FS) | gfp;
+
/*
- * XXX: __getblk_slow() can not really deal with failure and
+ * XXX: __getblk_gfp() can not really deal with failure and
* will endlessly loop on improvised global reclaim. Prefer
* looping in the allocator rather than here, at least that
* code knows what it's doing.
@@ -1058,7 +1058,7 @@ failed:
* that page was dirty, the buffers are set dirty also.
*/
static int
-grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
+grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size, gfp_t gfp)
{
pgoff_t index;
int sizebits;
@@ -1085,11 +1085,12 @@ grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
}
/* Create a page with the proper size buffers.. */
- return grow_dev_page(bdev, block, index, size, sizebits);
+ return grow_dev_page(bdev, block, index, size, sizebits, gfp);
}
-static struct buffer_head *
-__getblk_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
+struct buffer_head *
+__getblk_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
+ unsigned size, gfp_t gfp)
{
/* Size must be multiple of hard sectorsize */
if (unlikely(size & (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev)-1) ||
@@ -1111,13 +1112,14 @@ __getblk_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
if (bh)
return bh;
- ret = grow_buffers(bdev, block, size);
+ ret = grow_buffers(bdev, block, size, gfp);
if (ret < 0)
return NULL;
if (ret == 0)
free_more_memory();
}
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__getblk_slow);
/*
* The relationship between dirty buffers and dirty pages:
@@ -1371,24 +1373,25 @@ __find_get_block(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, unsigned size)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__find_get_block);
/*
- * __getblk will locate (and, if necessary, create) the buffer_head
+ * __getblk_gfp will locate (and, if necessary, create) the buffer_head
* which corresponds to the passed block_device, block and size. The
* returned buffer has its reference count incremented.
*
- * __getblk() will lock up the machine if grow_dev_page's try_to_free_buffers()
- * attempt is failing. FIXME, perhaps?
+ * __getblk()_gfp will lock up the machine if grow_dev_page's
+ * try_to_free_buffers() attempt is failing. FIXME, perhaps?
*/
struct buffer_head *
-__getblk(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, unsigned size)
+__getblk_gfp(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
+ unsigned size, gfp_t gfp)
{
struct buffer_head *bh = __find_get_block(bdev, block, size);
might_sleep();
if (bh == NULL)
- bh = __getblk_slow(bdev, block, size);
+ bh = __getblk_slow(bdev, block, size, gfp);
return bh;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__getblk);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__getblk_gfp);
/*
* Do async read-ahead on a buffer..
@@ -1410,18 +1413,39 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__breadahead);
* @size: size (in bytes) to read
*
* Reads a specified block, and returns buffer head that contains it.
+ * The page cache is allocated from movable area so that it can be migrated.
* It returns NULL if the block was unreadable.
*/
struct buffer_head *
__bread(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, unsigned size)
{
- struct buffer_head *bh = __getblk(bdev, block, size);
+ return __bread_gfp(bdev, block, size, __GFP_MOVABLE);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bread);
+
+/**
+ * __bread_gfp() - reads a specified block and returns the bh
+ * @bdev: the block_device to read from
+ * @block: number of block
+ * @size: size (in bytes) to read
+ * @gfp: page allocation flag
+ *
+ * Reads a specified block, and returns buffer head that contains it.
+ * The page cache can be allocated from non-movable area
+ * not to prevent page migration if you set gfp to zero.
+ * It returns NULL if the block was unreadable.
+ */
+struct buffer_head *
+__bread_gfp(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
+ unsigned size, gfp_t gfp)
+{
+ struct buffer_head *bh = __getblk_gfp(bdev, block, size, gfp);
if (likely(bh) && !buffer_uptodate(bh))
bh = __bread_slow(bh);
return bh;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bread);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bread_gfp);
/*
* invalidate_bh_lrus() is called rarely - but not only at unmount.
diff --git a/include/linux/buffer_head.h b/include/linux/buffer_head.h
index 324329c..6073f5d 100644
--- a/include/linux/buffer_head.h
+++ b/include/linux/buffer_head.h
@@ -175,12 +175,14 @@ void __wait_on_buffer(struct buffer_head *);
wait_queue_head_t *bh_waitq_head(struct buffer_head *bh);
struct buffer_head *__find_get_block(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
unsigned size);
-struct buffer_head *__getblk(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
- unsigned size);
+struct buffer_head *__getblk_gfp(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
+ unsigned size, gfp_t gfp);
void __brelse(struct buffer_head *);
void __bforget(struct buffer_head *);
void __breadahead(struct block_device *, sector_t block, unsigned int size);
struct buffer_head *__bread(struct block_device *, sector_t block, unsigned size);
+struct buffer_head *__bread_gfp(struct block_device *,
+ sector_t block, unsigned size, gfp_t gfp);
void invalidate_bh_lrus(void);
struct buffer_head *alloc_buffer_head(gfp_t gfp_flags);
void free_buffer_head(struct buffer_head * bh);
@@ -295,7 +297,13 @@ static inline void bforget(struct buffer_head *bh)
static inline struct buffer_head *
sb_bread(struct super_block *sb, sector_t block)
{
- return __bread(sb->s_bdev, block, sb->s_blocksize);
+ return __bread_gfp(sb->s_bdev, block, sb->s_blocksize, __GFP_MOVABLE);
+}
+
+static inline struct buffer_head *
+sb_bread_unmovable(struct super_block *sb, sector_t block)
+{
+ return __bread_gfp(sb->s_bdev, block, sb->s_blocksize, 0);
}
static inline void
@@ -307,7 +315,7 @@ sb_breadahead(struct super_block *sb, sector_t block)
static inline struct buffer_head *
sb_getblk(struct super_block *sb, sector_t block)
{
- return __getblk(sb->s_bdev, block, sb->s_blocksize);
+ return __getblk_gfp(sb->s_bdev, block, sb->s_blocksize, __GFP_MOVABLE);
}
static inline struct buffer_head *
@@ -344,6 +352,20 @@ static inline void lock_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh)
__lock_buffer(bh);
}
+static inline struct buffer_head *getblk_unmovable(struct block_device *bdev,
+ sector_t block,
+ unsigned size)
+{
+ return __getblk_gfp(bdev, block, size, 0);
+}
+
+static inline struct buffer_head *__getblk(struct block_device *bdev,
+ sector_t block,
+ unsigned size)
+{
+ return __getblk_gfp(bdev, block, size, __GFP_MOVABLE);
+}
+
extern int __set_page_dirty_buffers(struct page *page);
#else /* CONFIG_BLOCK */
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-29 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-28 2:26 [PATCHv3 0/3] new APIs to allocate buffer-cache " Gioh Kim
2014-08-28 2:31 ` [PATCHv3 1/3] fs/buffer.c: allocate buffer cache " Gioh Kim
2014-08-28 10:59 ` Jan Kara
2014-08-29 4:48 ` Gioh Kim [this message]
2014-09-01 7:53 ` Jan Kara
2014-09-01 8:02 ` Gioh Kim
2014-08-28 2:32 ` [PATCHv3 2/3] ext4: allocate buffer-cache for superblock in, non-movable area Gioh Kim
2014-08-28 10:06 ` Jan Kara
2014-08-28 2:33 ` [PATCHv3 3/3] jbd/jbd2: allocate buffer-cache for superblock inode in " Gioh Kim
2014-08-28 10:07 ` Jan Kara
2014-08-28 13:48 ` [PATCHv3 0/3] new APIs to allocate buffer-cache with user specific flag Theodore Ts'o
2014-08-29 0:22 ` Gioh Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5400061B.7060709@lge.com \
--to=gioh.kim@lge.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gunho.lee@lge.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome