Re: [PATCHv10 0/4] Common Mailbox Framework

[Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>]

Jassi,

On 08/02/2014 02:48 AM, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On 1 August 2014 23:56, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 05:59:54PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>  Here's v10. Not much different from v9. The code and the generic
>>> bindings looked good enough to relevant gods, but the patchset still
>>> needs some formal loving in the form of Acked-by's.
>>>
>>> Changes since v9:
>>>  o Purely cosmetic changes - added headers and used BIT()
>>
>> Given that this code is now getting very stable can I suggest setting up
>> a git tree and making sure it's included in -next?  Just send Stephen a
>> mail with a pointer to the relevant tree and branch and ask him to add it.
>>
>> I'd say it's probably worth merging at this point though since it's not
>> been in -next yet and the merge window is likely to open this weekend it
>> might be a bit much to try to merge it this window.
>>
> Thanks, sounds good. Will do.

Is there anything pending on this series to make it into 3.18?

This is one of the dependencies for our AM335/AM437 PM suspend support,
so it would be great to see this in 3.18, so that we can target 3.19 for
the PM series.

regards
Suman