From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751020AbaIUJ1g (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Sep 2014 05:27:36 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com ([209.85.192.172]:64873 "EHLO mail-pd0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750707AbaIUJ1e (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Sep 2014 05:27:34 -0400 Message-ID: <541E99FF.9050607@plexistor.com> Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 12:27:27 +0300 From: Boaz Harrosh User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Williams , Jeff Moyer CC: Boaz Harrosh , Ross Zwisler , Jens Axboe , Matthew Wilcox , linux-fsdevel , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org Subject: Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH v2] pmem: Initial version of persistent memory driver References: <1409173922-7484-1-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> <1409173922-7484-2-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> <540F2977.7010006@plexistor.com> <541050E5.60502@gmail.com> <54108ECA.6090200@plexistor.com> <54117D3A.3010305@plexistor.com> <5415797A.7000700@plexistor.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/19/2014 07:27 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > before adding any new device > discovery capabilities to pmem. > I lost you? what "new device discovery capabilities" do you see in Ross's or my code to pmem? Actually my point is that I hope there will never be any. That the discovery should be elsewhere in an ARCH/driver LLD and pmem stays generic. I feel we are not disagreeing, just not communicating. Please explain again, sorry for not understanding. What in the code I sent, you do not like? What in the code is dependent on UEFI organization's paper. That might need to change? Again sorry for being slow. please explain again? Thanks Boaz