From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] x86, cpu-hotplug: fix llc shared map unreleased during cpu hotplug
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 13:46:29 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5420FB25.8050102@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1410938272-7217-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
(2014/09/17 16:17), Wanpeng Li wrote:
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000004
> IP: [..] find_busiest_group
> PGD 5a9d5067 PUD 13067 PMD 0
> Oops: 0000 [#3] SMP
> [...]
> Call Trace:
> load_balance
> ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
> idle_balance
> __schedule
> schedule
> schedule_timeout
> ? lock_timer_base
> schedule_timeout_uninterruptible
> msleep
> lock_device_hotplug_sysfs
> online_store
> dev_attr_store
> sysfs_write_file
> vfs_write
> SyS_write
> system_call_fastpath
>
> This bug can be triggered by hot add and remove large number of xen
> domain0's vcpus repeatedly.
>
> Last level cache shared map is built during cpu up and build sched domain
> routine takes advantage of it to setup sched domain cpu topology, however,
> llc shared map is unreleased during cpu disable which lead to invalid sched
> domain cpu topology. This patch fix it by release llc shared map correctly
> during cpu disable.
>
> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Tested-by: Linn Crosetto <linn@hp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Yasuaki reported this can happen on our real hardware.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/22/1018
Our case is here.
==
Here is a example on my system.
My system has 4 sockets and each socket has 15 cores and HT is enabled.
In this case, each core of sockes is numbered as follows:
| CPU#
Socket#0 | 0-14 , 60-74
Socket#1 | 15-29, 75-89
Socket#2 | 30-44, 90-104
Socket#3 | 45-59, 105-119
Then llc_shared_mask of CPU#30 has 0x3fff80000001fffc0000000.
It means that last level cache of Socket#2 is shared with
CPU#30-44 and 90-104.
When hot-removing socket#2 and #3, each core of sockets is numbered
as follows:
| CPU#
Socket#0 | 0-14 , 60-74
Socket#1 | 15-29, 75-89
But llc_shared_mask is not cleared. So llc_shared_mask of CPU#30 remains
having 0x3fff80000001fffc0000000.
After that, when hot-adding socket#2 and #3, each core of sockets is
numbered as follows:
| CPU#
Socket#0 | 0-14 , 60-74
Socket#1 | 15-29, 75-89
Socket#2 | 30-59
Socket#3 | 90-119
Then llc_shared_mask of CPU#30 becomes 0x3fff8000fffffffc0000000.
It means that last level cache of Socket#2 is shared with CPU#30-59
and 90-104. So the mask has wrong value.
At first, I cleared hot-removed CPU number's bit from llc_shared_map
when hot removing CPU. But Borislav suggested that the problem will
disappear if readded CPU is assigned same CPU number. And llc_shared_map
must not be changed.
==
So, please.
Thanks,
-Kame
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-23 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-17 7:17 Wanpeng Li
2014-09-21 23:11 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-09-23 4:46 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki [this message]
2014-09-23 6:36 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-09-23 7:56 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-09-23 9:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-09-23 23:48 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-09-24 7:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-09-24 8:18 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5420FB25.8050102@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome