From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932404AbaIWVMw (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2014 17:12:52 -0400 Received: from mo4.mail-out.ovh.net ([178.32.228.4]:45011 "EHLO mo4.mail-out.ovh.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932295AbaIWVMv (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2014 17:12:51 -0400 Message-ID: <5421E00B.2050404@ventoso.org> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 23:03:07 +0200 From: Luca Olivetti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?windows-1252?Q?Frank_Sch=E4fer?= , Fengguang Wu CC: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Jet Chen , Su Tao , Yuanhan Liu , LKP , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, crope@iki.fi Subject: Re: [media/dvb_usb_af9005] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request (WAS: [media/em28xx] BUG: unable to handle kernel) References: <20140919014124.GA8326@localhost> <541C7D9D.30908@googlemail.com> <541C826D.7060702@googlemail.com> <541C8A26.6050207@ventoso.org> <5421C187.2070407@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <5421C187.2070407@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 16145123189639580063 X-Ovh-Remote: 85.58.156.83 (83.pool85-58-156.dynamic.orange.es) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-OVH-SPAMSTATE: OK X-OVH-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-OVH-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeejgedrheehucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeejgedrheehucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org El 23/09/14 20:52, Frank Schäfer ha escrit: >>> This seems to be an ancient bug, which is known at least since 5 1/2 years: >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/4/350 [...] >> >> #if defined(CONFIG_MODULE) || defined(CONFIG_DVB_USB_AF9005_REMOTE) > What happens, if CONFIG_MODULES is enabled, but neither module > af9005-remote nor any other IR module is available ? > Has this ever been tested ? I think I tested at the time and symbol_request returned NULL in that case, however I'm not sure and I cannot find any documentation on how symbol_request is supposed to work in that case. Bye -- Luca