mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"benh@kernel.crashing.org" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	"chris@zankel.net" <chris@zankel.net>,
	"cmetcalf@tilera.com" <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"deller@gmx.de" <deller@gmx.de>,
	"dhowells@redhat.com" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"geert@linux-m68k.org" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	"heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com" <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"jcmvbkbc@gmail.com" <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	"jesper.nilsson@axis.com" <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"monstr@monstr.eu" <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	"paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"rdunlap@infradead.org" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	"sam@ravnborg.org" <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	"schwidefsky@de.ibm.com" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	"starvik@axis.com" <starvik@axis.com>,
	"takata@linux-m32r.org" <takata@linux-m32r.org>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"broonie@linaro.org" <broonie@linaro.org>,
	"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"thierry.reding@gmail.com" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/17] Cross-architecture definitions of relaxed MMIO accessors
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 16:24:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54243395.902@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4240583.SJ4jiIW6Zy@wuerfel>

On 25/09/14 16:15, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 25 September 2014 17:07:47 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
>> The current version doesn't let you do that, so I'll keel the #ifdef
>> sections separate. This also means that I won't apply your patch 17:
>> we will keep needing the #ifdef to support all three relevant combinations:
>>
>> a) architectures that provide neither and want to get the defaults
>>    from asm-generic
>> b) architectures that provide the non-relaxed versions and want tog
>>    to get just the relaxed version from asm-generic
>> c) architectures that provide both
>>
> 
> And here is the new version I applied:
> 
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/io.h b/include/asm-generic/io.h
> index 508a57257de5..3e976be3bdd4 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/io.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/io.h
> @@ -174,6 +174,43 @@ static inline void writeq(u64 value, void __iomem *addr)
>  #endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
>  
>  /*
> + * {read,write}{b,w,l,q}_relaxed() are like the regular version, but
> + * are not guaranteed to provide ordering against spinlocks or memory
> + * accesses.
> + */
> +#ifndef readb_relaxed
> +#define readb_relaxed readb
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef readw_relaxed
> +#define readw_relaxed readw
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef readl_relaxed
> +#define readl_relaxed readl
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef readq_relaxed
> +#define readq_relaxed readq
> +#endif

Not really sure if it matters but this gives a rather surprising
behaviour to #ifdef readq_relaxed given that readq may not be defined.

> +
> +#ifndef writeb_relaxed
> +#define writeb_relaxed writeb
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef writew_relaxed
> +#define writew_relaxed writew
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef writel_relaxed
> +#define writel_relaxed writel
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef writeq_relaxed
> +#define writeq_relaxed writeq
> +#endif

Ditto.


> +
> +/*
>   * {read,write}s{b,w,l,q}() repeatedly access the same memory address in
>   * native endianness in 8-, 16-, 32- or 64-bit chunks (@count times).
>   */
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-25 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-24 17:17 Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] asm-generic: io: implement relaxed accessor macros as conditional wrappers Will Deacon
2014-09-25 10:32   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 10:38     ` Will Deacon
2014-09-25 10:43       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 11:44         ` Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] microblaze: io: remove dummy relaxed accessor macros Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] s390: io: remove dummy relaxed accessor macros for reads Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] xtensa: " Will Deacon
2014-09-25 15:22   ` Max Filippov
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] frv: io: implement dummy relaxed accessor macros for writes Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] cris: " Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] ia64: " Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] m32r: " Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] m68k: " Will Deacon
2014-09-25  1:05   ` Greg Ungerer
2014-09-25  9:33     ` Will Deacon
2014-09-25  9:51       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-09-25 10:33         ` Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] mn10300: " Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] parisc: " Will Deacon
2014-09-25 20:00   ` Helge Deller
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] powerpc: " Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] sparc: " Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] tile: " Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] x86: " Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] documentation: memory-barriers: clarify relaxed io accessor semantics Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] asm-generic: io: define relaxed accessor macros unconditionally Will Deacon
2014-09-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v3 00/17] Cross-architecture definitions of relaxed MMIO accessors Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 13:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 14:55   ` Will Deacon
2014-09-25 15:07     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 15:15       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 15:24         ` Daniel Thompson [this message]
2014-09-25 19:17           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 20:17             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-09-26  8:40             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-26  9:28               ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-26  8:05         ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-26 13:39           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-26 13:46             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-26 21:36               ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-29  8:23                 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-29  9:50                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-01 15:23                     ` Thierry Reding
2014-10-01 18:34                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-29  9:25                 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-29  9:48                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-30 16:59   ` Will Deacon
2014-10-30 20:04     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-31 11:09       ` Thierry Reding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54243395.902@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=broonie@linaro.org \
    --cc=chris@zankel.net \
    --cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=jesper.nilsson@axis.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=starvik@axis.com \
    --cc=takata@linux-m32r.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome