mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/dl: Cleanup prio_changed_dl()
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:13:21 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5425501412003601@web12j.yandex.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <542974DE.8050203@arm.com>



29.09.2014, 19:03, "Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@arm.com>:
> Hi Kirill,
>
> On 27/09/14 09:41, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>>  From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
>>
>>  Now rq->curr task can't be dequeued in this function
>>  (it's possible only in __schedule()).
>
> Could you please detail about "before", with a reference to the commit
> that made this further change necessary?

I wrote about unlocked context switching, but I've looked one more time
and found that it used to be impossible before too.

We set "rq->curr = next" before prepare_lock_switch(),
so dequeued task wasn't able to be curr.

I'll update both descriptions in v2.

Thanks,
Kirill

>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> - Juri
>>  Also, delete "else" branch which is dead code.
>>
>>  Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
>>  ---
>>   kernel/sched/deadline.c |   50 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>>   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>>  diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>>  index 63f8b4a..38b4f19 100644
>>  --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>>  +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>>  @@ -1638,35 +1638,33 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>>   static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
>>                               int oldprio)
>>   {
>>  - if (task_on_rq_queued(p) || rq->curr == p) {
>>  + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p))
>>  + return;
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>>  - /*
>>  - * This might be too much, but unfortunately
>>  - * we don't have the old deadline value, and
>>  - * we can't argue if the task is increasing
>>  - * or lowering its prio, so...
>>  - */
>>  - if (!rq->dl.overloaded)
>>  - pull_dl_task(rq);
>>  -
>>  - /*
>>  - * If we now have a earlier deadline task than p,
>>  - * then reschedule, provided p is still on this
>>  - * runqueue.
>>  - */
>>  - if (dl_time_before(rq->dl.earliest_dl.curr, p->dl.deadline) &&
>>  -    rq->curr == p)
>>  - resched_curr(rq);
>>  -#else
>>  - /*
>>  - * Again, we don't know if p has a earlier
>>  - * or later deadline, so let's blindly set a
>>  - * (maybe not needed) rescheduling point.
>>  - */
>>  + /*
>>  + * This might be too much, but unfortunately
>>  + * we don't have the old deadline value, and
>>  + * we can't argue if the task is increasing
>>  + * or lowering its prio, so...
>>  + */
>>  + if (!rq->dl.overloaded)
>>  + pull_dl_task(rq);
>>  + /*
>>  + * If we now have a earlier deadline task than p,
>>  + * then reschedule, provided p is still on this
>>  + * runqueue.
>>  + */
>>  + if (dl_time_before(rq->dl.earliest_dl.curr, p->dl.deadline) &&
>>  +    rq->curr == p)
>>                   resched_curr(rq);
>>  +#else
>>  + /*
>>  + * Again, we don't know if p has a earlier
>>  + * or later deadline, so let's blindly set a
>>  + * (maybe not needed) rescheduling point.
>>  + */
>>  + resched_curr(rq);
>>   #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>>  - } else
>>  - switched_to_dl(rq, p);
>>   }
>>
>>   const struct sched_class dl_sched_class = {

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-29 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-27  8:40 [PATCH 1/2] sched/dl: Implement cancel_dl_timer() to use in switched_from_dl() Kirill Tkhai
2014-09-27  8:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/dl: Cleanup prio_changed_dl() Kirill Tkhai
2014-09-29 15:03   ` Juri Lelli
2014-09-29 15:13     ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2014-09-29 15:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/dl: Implement cancel_dl_timer() to use in switched_from_dl() Juri Lelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5425501412003601@web12j.yandex.ru \
    --to=tkhai@yandex.ru \
    --cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=ktkhai@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome