From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754567AbaI2OKi (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:10:38 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34557 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754454AbaI2OKc (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:10:32 -0400 Message-ID: <54296856.2020104@suse.de> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:10:30 +0200 From: Hannes Reinecke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: James Bottomley , Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Robert Elliott , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/38] libata: use __scsi_print_command() References: <1411991947-130166-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <1411991947-130166-34-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <20140929140606.GB15925@htj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20140929140606.GB15925@htj.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/29/2014 04:06 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:59:02PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> libata already uses an internal buffer, so we should be using >> __scsi_print_command() here. >> >> Cc: Tejun Heo >> Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: LKML >> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke > > Applied to libata/for-3.18. > > Thanks. > Errm. Nice that you did, but it sort of relies for patches 01-32 to be applied previously. I'd rather apply your Signed-off-by: to the patch and have it routed through the SCSI tree; that way we're sure it'll only be applied if the previous patches are in. Can you please pull it from libata to avoid build issues? Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)