From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_FILTER has different values based on bitness
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:53:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54348AFF.7040809@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a957qt9c.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
On 10/7/14, 6:50 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
>>> index 963bf139e2b2..c805132ac1cf 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
>>> @@ -3714,6 +3714,7 @@ static long perf_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned
>>> int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>>> }
>>>
>>> case PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_FILTER:
>>> + case PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_FILTER_32:
>>> return perf_event_set_filter(event, (void __user *)arg);
>>>
>>> default:
>>>
>>
>> Oh, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ID has the same problem:
>>
>> #define PERF_EVENT_IOC_ID _IOR('$', 7, __u64 *)
>
> The right way is to add a compat_perf_ioctl()
Sure, looked into that way as well. But SET_FILTER and IOC_ID will still
compile to the same values for a 64-bit kernel.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-08 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-07 23:07 David Ahern
2014-10-07 23:17 ` David Ahern
2014-10-08 0:50 ` Andi Kleen
2014-10-08 0:53 ` David Ahern [this message]
2014-10-08 0:54 ` Andi Kleen
2014-10-08 7:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-08 15:17 ` David Ahern
2014-10-08 15:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-10-08 15:25 ` David Ahern
2014-10-09 6:54 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54348AFF.7040809@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome