Re: [PATCH 1/5] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for MIPI DSI bus

[Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>]

On 10/27/2014 03:17 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:48:26AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index dd31933..476679c 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -3071,6 +3071,13 @@ F:	drivers/gpu/vga/
>>  F:	include/drm/
>>  F:	include/uapi/drm/
>>  
>> +DRM MIPI DSI BUS
>> +M:	Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
>> +L:	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> +S:	Supported
>> +F:	drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
>> +F:	include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
> 
> I really prefer when common infrastructure like this doesn't get
> maintainer by a vendor. And I care with my intel hat on since we also ahve
> a dsi driver that sooner or later needs to be converted to to this stuff.
> 
> Why doesn't the usual model of merging stuff through Dave's tree, or if
> that doesn't work well due to patch depencies, through vendor trees with
> Dave's ack?

The main intention of this patch is to be on CC in case of patches
touching MIPI DSI bus.
I do not want to create separate tree for such small subsystem.

So if such things are not allowed please drop the patch and sorry for
the noise.

Regards
Andrzej

> 
> Thanks, Daniel
> 
>> +
>>  RADEON DRM DRIVERS
>>  M:	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
>>  M:	Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>> -- 
>> 1.9.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>