From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com>,
"Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@metux.net>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
"Yuan, Perry" <Perry.Yuan@dell.com>
Cc: "mgross@linux.intel.com" <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
"pali@kernel.org" <pali@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-privacy: Add support for new privacy driver
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:55:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <544bc53f-c260-9e46-15a9-2ec2ea41343c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR19MB2636D792A7CCEE8937579EA6FAE70@DM6PR19MB2636.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Hi,
On 11/12/20 4:31 PM, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
>>> Pressing the mute key activates a time delayed circuit to physically cut
>>> off the mute. The LED is in the same circuit, so it reflects the true
>>> state of the HW mute. The reason for the EC "ack" is so that software
>>> can first invoke a SW mute before the HW circuit is cut off. Without SW
>>> cutting this off first does not affect the time delayed muting or status
>>> of the LED but there is a possibility of a "popping" noise leading to a
>>> poor user experience.
>>
>> how long is that timeout ?
>
> The exact duration is controlled by component selection in the circuit.
> Linux is typically able to respond faster than Windows in this case.
>
>>
>>> Exposing as an LED device allows the codec drivers notification path to
>>> EC ACK to work.
>>
>> Which driver exactly ? Who's gonna access this LED ?
>
> The flow is like this:
>
> 1) User presses key. HW does stuff with this key (timeout is started)
> 2) Event is emitted from FW
> 3) Event received by dell-privacy
> 4) KEY_MICMUTE emitted from dell-privacy
> 5) Userland picks up key and modifies kcontrol for SW mute
> 6) Codec kernel driver catches and calls ledtrig_audio_set, like this:
>
> ledtrig_audio_set(LED_AUDIO_MICMUTE, rt715->micmute_led ? LED_ON : LED_OFF);
>
> 7) If "LED" is set to on dell-privacy notifies ec, and timeout is cancelled,
> HW mic mute activated.
>
> Again, if anything in this flow doesn't happen HW mic mute is still activated,
> just will take longer (for duration of timeout) and have popping noise.
Thank you, can we put this in a comment in the driver please ?
I guess this also means that the led_class device is just there to
catch the ledtrig_audio_set() call so that dell-firmware can tell the
EC that the sw-mute is done and that it can move ahead with the hw-mute.
While the real, physical LED is fully under hardware control, right ?
That should probably also be in the same comment in the driver
(feel free to re-use part of my wording for that if that helps).
Regards,
Hans
>
>>
>>
>> --mtx
>>
>> --
>> ---
>> Hinweis: unverschlüsselte E-Mails können leicht abgehört und manipuliert
>> werden ! Für eine vertrauliche Kommunikation senden Sie bitte ihren
>> GPG/PGP-Schlüssel zu.
>> ---
>> Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
>> Free software and Linux embedded engineering
>> info@metux.net -- +49-151-27565287
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-12 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-03 12:55 Perry Yuan
2020-11-03 16:22 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-03 16:50 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-03 19:14 ` Barnabás Pőcze
2020-11-04 1:49 ` Matthew Garrett
2020-11-11 7:21 ` Yuan, Perry
2020-11-11 7:24 ` Matthew Garrett
2020-11-11 14:30 ` Limonciello, Mario
2020-11-12 15:06 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2020-11-12 15:31 ` Limonciello, Mario
2020-11-12 15:55 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2020-11-12 15:57 ` Limonciello, Mario
2020-11-04 6:43 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-09 11:16 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-11 7:24 ` Yuan, Perry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=544bc53f-c260-9e46-15a9-2ec2ea41343c@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=Mario.Limonciello@dell.com \
--cc=Perry.Yuan@dell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@metux.net \
--cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®