Re: [RFH] Partition table recovery

["Indan Zupancic" <indan@nul.nu>]

On Sun, July 22, 2007 18:28, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 07:10:31AM +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
>> Sounds great, but it may be advisable to hook this into the partition
>> modification routines instead of mkfs/fsck.  Which would mean that the
>> partition manager could ask the kernel to instruct its fs subsystem to
>> update the backup partition table for each known fs-type that supports such
>> a feature.
>
> Well, let's think about this a bit.  What are the requirements?
>
> 1) The partition manager should be able explicitly request that a new
> backup of the partition tables be stashed in each filesystem that has
> room for such a backup.  That way, when the user affirmatively makes a
> partition table change, it can get backed up in all of the right
> places automatically.
>
> 2) The fsck program should *only* stash a backup of the partition
> table if there currently isn't one in the filesystem.  It may be that
> the partition table has been corrupted, and so merely doing an fsck
> should not transfer a current copy of the partition table to the
> filesystem-secpfic backup area.  It could be that the partition table
> was only partially recovered, and we don't want to overwrite the
> previously existing backups except on an explicit request from the
> system administrator.
>
> 3) The mkfs program should automatically create a backup of the
> current partition table layout.  That way we get a backup in the newly
> created filesystem as soon as it is created.
>
> 4) The exact location of the backup may vary from filesystem to
> filesystem.  For ext2/3/4, bytes 512-1023 are always unused, and don't
> interfere with the boot sector at bytes 0-511, so that's the obvious
> location.  Other filesystems may have that location in use, and some
> other location might be a better place to store it.  Ideally it will
> be a well-known location, that isn't dependent on finding an inode
> table, or some such, but that may not be possible for all filesystems.

To be on the safe side, maybe also add a checksum, timestamp and
something identifying the disk the filesystem was created on.

Regards,

Indan