From: Akira Hayakawa <ruby.wktk@gmail.com>
To: ejt@redhat.com
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
snitzer@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] staging: writeboost: Add dm-writeboost
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 23:43:46 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54885C22.3030808@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141210134223.GE21108@debian>
On 12/10/14 10:42 PM, Joe Thornber wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:31:31PM +0900, Akira Hayakawa wrote:
>> Joe,
>>
>>> So you copy the bio payload to a different block of ram and then
>>> complete the bio? Or does the rambuf refer to the bio payload
>>> directly?
>> Good question.
>> The answer is, copy the data (got by bio_data(bio)) to rambuf once
>> and ack if it's not barrier things.
>> It would be nice if data in rambuf points to bio payload but it now copies
>> because bio payload can be reused after completion. Am I right?
>> Is there a way of eliminate memory copying?
>
> You *have* to eliminate this memory copying. Remap the bios to the
> relevant portion of your log, and don't complete them until you log
> chunk is coherent.
>
Barrier writes don't ack until the log is written on cache device.
I guess treating other writes as well will do this work.
But, it will be much better if I can do this by manipulating reference count
of the bio payload. I am not sure how the implementation would be.
Anyway, thanks for advice,
- Akira
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-10 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-07 12:35 Akira Hayakawa
2014-12-07 20:08 ` Greg KH
2014-12-07 21:04 ` Akira Hayakawa
2014-12-09 15:12 ` [dm-devel] " Joe Thornber
2014-12-09 15:48 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-10 10:21 ` Akira Hayakawa
2014-12-10 10:00 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH] " Joe Thornber
2014-12-10 11:00 ` Akira Hayakawa
2014-12-10 11:22 ` Joe Thornber
2014-12-10 12:33 ` Joe Thornber
2014-12-10 12:59 ` Akira Hayakawa
2014-12-10 13:13 ` Joe Thornber
2014-12-10 13:31 ` Akira Hayakawa
2014-12-10 13:42 ` Joe Thornber
2014-12-10 14:43 ` Akira Hayakawa [this message]
2014-12-12 12:51 ` Marian Csontos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54885C22.3030808@gmail.com \
--to=ruby.wktk@gmail.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=ejt@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome